Cited by 48Cancer survivorship and careWomen's cancer prevention and managementCancer-related cognitive impairment studies

Longitudinal assessment of distress and quality of life in the early stages of breast cancer treatment

Costa‐Requena, Gema, Rodríguez, Ana, Fernández‐Ortega, Paz·2013·Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences

Abstract

Scand J Caring Sci; 2013; 27; 77–83 Longitudinal assessment of distress and quality of life in the early stages of breast cancer treatment Background: During breast cancer treatment, a decline in quality of life and the patient’s psychological well‐being is observed. The purpose of this study was to assess levels of quality of life and psychological distress during breast cancer treatment. Methods: Utilizing a longitudinal design, patients with breast cancer were assessed at three time‐points during treatment. The within‐subject analysis of variance was conducted to compare subscales of quality of life. Linear regression analyses were utilized to determine the contribution of psychological distress to the quality of life at each time assessment. Results: Significant differences between the assessment times on the physical subscale (p < 0.001), socio‐family (p < 0.01) and emotional well‐being (p < 0.001) were showed. Specific domain‐related breast cancer and psychological distress (p < 0.05) were significant during the assessment period. No difference was found on the total quality of life score within the three points of reference for treatment. The regression analysis revealed that after treatment, psychological distress showed a higher percentage of variance of the quality of life (62.6%) compared to other treatment time‐points. Conclusions: Significant changes to the quality of life and psychological distress subscales are seen during breast cancer treatment. The degree to which psychological distress affected quality of life varied over the illness continuum. Health professionals should pay attention to the variability of the emotional support and care needs of patients with cancer at different times of treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2012.01003.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Costa‐Requena, G., Rodríguez, A., & Fernández‐Ortega, P.
Affiliations
  • Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari (ES)
  • Duran i Reynals Hospital (ES)
  • Institut Català d'Oncologia (ES)
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-05-14
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
77-83
ISSN
  • 0283-9318 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-6712
OpenAlex
W1491311127
Cited by
48
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Keywords
breast cancer, quality of life, psychological distress, emotional well-being, physical well-being, longitudinal change in quality of life, emotional support needs
MeSH terms
Adult, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review