Longitudinal assessment of distress and quality of life in the early stages of breast cancer treatment
Abstract
Scand J Caring Sci; 2013; 27; 77–83 Longitudinal assessment of distress and quality of life in the early stages of breast cancer treatment Background: During breast cancer treatment, a decline in quality of life and the patient’s psychological well‐being is observed. The purpose of this study was to assess levels of quality of life and psychological distress during breast cancer treatment. Methods: Utilizing a longitudinal design, patients with breast cancer were assessed at three time‐points during treatment. The within‐subject analysis of variance was conducted to compare subscales of quality of life. Linear regression analyses were utilized to determine the contribution of psychological distress to the quality of life at each time assessment. Results: Significant differences between the assessment times on the physical subscale (p < 0.001), socio‐family (p < 0.01) and emotional well‐being (p < 0.001) were showed. Specific domain‐related breast cancer and psychological distress (p < 0.05) were significant during the assessment period. No difference was found on the total quality of life score within the three points of reference for treatment. The regression analysis revealed that after treatment, psychological distress showed a higher percentage of variance of the quality of life (62.6%) compared to other treatment time‐points. Conclusions: Significant changes to the quality of life and psychological distress subscales are seen during breast cancer treatment. The degree to which psychological distress affected quality of life varied over the illness continuum. Health professionals should pay attention to the variability of the emotional support and care needs of patients with cancer at different times of treatment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Interventions led by nurses as opposed to psychologists have been associated with less benefit in terms of psychological outcomes.
“However, although acceptability of nurse-led interventions may be higher, evidence for their efficacy for psychological outcomes is limited [40], and interventions led by nurses as opposed to psychologists have been associated with less benefit in terms of psychological outcomes [41].”
From Psychological intervention targeting distress for cancer patients: a meta-analytic study investigating uptake and adherence. (2016) · cites this paper as [41]
Nurse-led interventions are associated with less benefit in terms of psychological outcomes than psychologist-led interventions.
“as opposed to psychologists have been associated with less benefit in terms of psychological outcomes [41].”
From Psychological intervention targeting distress for cancer patients: a meta-analytic study investigating uptake and adherence. (2016) · cites this paper as [41]
Cites
Brady, M. J., Cella, D. F., Mo, F., Bonomi, A. E., Tulsky, D. S., Lloyd, S. R., Deasy, S., Cobleigh, M., & Shiomoto, G. (1997) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1997.15.3.974 · Cited by 1,752 · see citing works
Costanzo, E. S., Lutgendorf, S. K., Mattes, M. L., Trehan, S., Robinson, C. B., Tewfik, F., & Roman, S. L. (2007) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6604091 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Brebach, R., Sharpe, L., Costa, D. S. J., Rhodes, P., & Butow, P. (2016) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.4099 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Psychological treatments to improve quality of life in cancer contexts: a meta-analysis
de la Torre-Luque, A., Gambara, H., López, E., & Cruzado, J. A. (2016) · International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.ijchp.2015.07.005 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Brown, S. L., Hughes, M., Campbell, S., & Cherry, M. G. (2020) · Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy · doi:10.1002/cpp.2399 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
- Authors
- Costa‐Requena, G., Rodríguez, A., & Fernández‐Ortega, P.
- Affiliations
- Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari (ES)
- Duran i Reynals Hospital (ES)
- Institut Català d'Oncologia (ES)
- Venue
- Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-05-14
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 77-83
- ISSN
- 0283-9318 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-6712
- OpenAlex
- W1491311127
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 2.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
- Keywords
- breast cancer, quality of life, psychological distress, emotional well-being, physical well-being, longitudinal change in quality of life, emotional support needs
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Stress, Psychological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review