Cited by 55Cancer survivorship and careMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Could worry and rumination mediate relationships between self‐compassion and psychological distress in breast cancer survivors?

Open access
Brown, Stephen L., Hughes, Maria, Campbell, Sophie, Cherry, M. Gemma·2020·Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy

Abstract

Many breast cancer (BCa) patients experience clinically significant anxiety and depression in survivorship. Self‐compassion offers a bulwark to anxiety and depression in nonclinical, mental health, and some chronic physical health populations. We examined whether self‐compassion predicted lower anxiety and depression symptoms in survivors and whether this might be mediated by lower worry and rumination. The design was a cross‐sectional survey using self‐report measures. Female adult BCa survivors of mixed stages who had finished primary surgical, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy treatments completed self‐compassion subscales and worry, rumination, and anxiety and depression scales. Higher self‐compassion subscale scores were negatively associated with anxiety and depression. Depressive brooding and worry mediated any effects of self‐kindness and mindfulness on depression and anxiety, whereas common humanity directly predicted lower depression scores. Findings are consistent with the view that self‐compassion reduces threat‐related rumination and worry in BCa survivors, consequently reducing anxiety and depression. This may form a basis for prevention and treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cpp.2399

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 72 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brown, S. L., Hughes, M., Campbell, S., & Cherry, M. G.
Affiliations
University of Liverpool (GB)
Corresponding author
Brown, Stephen L.
Venue
Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-12-04
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
1-10
ISSN
  • 1063-3995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0879
OpenAlex
W2990357766
Cited by
55
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7
FWCI
2.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RUNE (Research UNE) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
self-compassion, breast cancer survivors, worry, rumination, anxiety, depression, psychological distress, mediation, self-kindness, mindfulness, common humanity
MeSH terms
Rumination, Cognitive, Psychological Distress, Anxiety Disorders, Breast Neoplasms, Empathy, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Stress, Psychological, Survivors, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review