Cited by 40Essential Oils and Antimicrobial ActivityBacterial biofilms and quorum sensingAntimicrobial agents and applications

Effects of a topical essential oil-containing formulation on biofilm-forming coagulase-negative staphylococci

Open access
Al-Shuneigat, J., Cox, S.D., Markham, J.L.·2005·Letters in Applied Microbiology

Abstract

AIMS: To evaluate the antimicrobial effects of Polytoxinol (PT), a topical essential oil-based formulation, against biofilm positive strains of coagulase-negative staphylococci. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using a microtitre plate assay we measured inhibitory effects for PT against a selection of biofilm-forming clinical isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci. Susceptibility varied considerably (MIC = 0.6-20 000 ppm). For the most tolerant clinical isolate (Staphylococcus warneri) biofilm growth was inhibited by a 32-fold lower PT concentration than planktonic growth. This inhibition of biofilm development, which was not observed with the other test isolates, was related to an inhibition of the initial phase of S. warneri cell adherence to the polystyrene surface. CONCLUSION: The antimicrobial efficacy of PT was verified against clinical isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci in vitro. PT was able to inhibit biofilm formation in the most tolerant isolate at sub-inhibitory concentrations. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: These observations indicate that an ability to prevent biofilm formation, independently of effects on cell viability may contribute to the in vivo topical efficacy of essential oils.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1472-765x.2005.01699.x

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Different essential oils from ornamental plants have been observed to be effective against biofilms formed by Salmonella, Listeria, Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus and Lactobacillus spp.

    “Different EOs from ornamental plants have been observed to be effective against biofilms formed by Salmonella, Listeria, Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus and Lactobacillus spp.”

    From Effect of essential oils on pathogenic bacteria (2013) · cites this paper as [127]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Al-Shuneigat, J., Cox, S. D., & Markham, J. L.
Affiliations
Western Sydney University (AU)
Corresponding author
Cox, S.D.
Venue
Letters in Applied Microbiology
Published
2005-07
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
52-55
ISSN
  • 0266-8254 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2673
OpenAlex
W2029140268
Cited by
40
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Letters in Applied Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Sydney
  • University of Western Sydney
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Antimicrobial agents and applications
Keywords
coagulase-negative staphylococci, biofilm formation, essential oils, topical antimicrobial formulation, Staphylococcus warneri, cell adhesion, planktonic versus biofilm growth, minimum inhibitory concentration, subinhibitory concentrations
MeSH terms
Anti-Infective Agents, Local, Coagulase, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Humans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Staphylococcus, Biofilms, Tea Tree Oil

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review