The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessment of the bacterial diversity of breast milk of healthy women by quantitative real-time PCR
Abstract
AIMS: Breast milk has been described as a source of bacteria influencing the development of the infant gut microbiota. Up to the present, few studies have been focused on the application of culture-independent techniques to study bacterial diversity in breast milk. In this context, the aim of this study was to characterize the breast milk microbiota of healthy women by applying the quantitative real-time PCR technique (qRTi-PCR). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 50 breast milk samples were analysed by qPCR to assess the presence of different bacterial genera or clusters, including the Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, Staphylococcus, Bacteroides, Enterococcus, Streptococcus, Clostridium cluster IV and Clostridium cluster XIVa-XIVb groups. Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus were the predominant groups and were detected in all the samples. Clostridium XIVa-XIVb and Enterococcus were detected in most of the samples in contrast to the Bacteroides and Clostridium cluster IV groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm the abundance of bacterial DNA in breast milk samples and suggest that the qRTi-PCR technique has a huge potential in the microbiological analysis of human milk. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: qRTi-PCR allowed the detection of bacterial DNA of streptococci, staphylococci, lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria in the samples of human milk, which confirms that breast milk can be an important source of bacteria and bacterial DNA to the infant gut.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Human milk is a source of lactic acid bacteria for the infant gut
Martín, R., Langa, S., Reviriego, C., Jimínez, E., Marín, M. L., Xaus, J., Fernández, L., & Rodríguez, J. M. (2003) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2003.09.028 · Cited by 792
Self-citation
Cited by
The infant microbiome development: Mom matters
Mueller, N. T., Bakacs, E., Combellick, J., Grigoryan, Z., & Dominguez-Bello, M. G. (2015) · Trends in Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2014.12.002 · Cited by 943
Vertical mother–neonate transfer of maternal gut bacteria via breastfeeding
Jost, T., Lacroix, C., Braegger, C. P., Rochat, F., & Chassard, C. (2014) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/1462-2920.12238 · Cited by 580
Mother’s Milk: A purposeful contribution to the development of the infant microbiota and immunity
Le Doare, K., Holder, B., Bassett, A., & Pannaraj, P. S. (2018) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2018.00361 · Cited by 475
Arroyo, R., Martín, V., Maldonado, A., Jiménez, E., Fernández, L., & Rodríguez, J. M. (2010) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/652763 · Cited by 361
Self-citationHuman milk: a source of more life than we imagine
Jeurink, P. V., van Bergenhenegouwen, J., Jiménez, E., Knippels, L. M. J., Fernández, L., Garssen, J., Knol, J., Rodríguez, J. M., & Martín, R. (2013) · Beneficial Microbes · doi:10.3920/bm2012.0040 · Cited by 354
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Collado, M. C., Delgado, S., Maldonado, A., & Rodríguez, J. M.
- Venue
- Letters in Applied Microbiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-05
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 523-528
- ISSN
- 0266-8254 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-765X
- OpenAlex
- W2011891551
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of the bacterial diversity of breast milk of healthy women by quantitative real-time PCR. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1472-765x.2009.02567.x
- The paper
- Collado, M. C., Delgado, S., Maldonado, A., & Rodríguez, J. M. (2009). Assessment of the bacterial diversity of breast milk of healthy women by quantitative real-time PCR. Letters in Applied Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765x.2009.02567.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.