Cited by 792Infant Nutrition and HealthProbiotics and Fermented FoodsBreastfeeding Practices and Influences

Human milk is a source of lactic acid bacteria for the infant gut

Martín, Rocío, Langa, Susana, Reviriego, Carlota, Jimínez, Esther, Marín, María L, Xaus, Jordi, Fernández, Leonides, Rodríguez, Juan M·2003·The Journal of Pediatrics

Abstract

Objectives To investigate whether human breast milk contains potentially probiotic lactic acid bacteria, and therefore, whether it can be considered a synbiotic food. Study design Lactic acid bacteria were isolated from milk, mammary areola, and breast skin of eight healthy mothers and oral swabs and feces of their respective breast-fed infants. Some isolates (178 from each mother and newborn pair) were randomly selected and submitted to randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) polymerase chain reaction analysis, and those that displayed identical RAPD patterns were identified by 16S rDNA sequencing.Results Within each mother and newborn pair, some rod-shaped lactic acid bacteria isolated from mammary areola, breast milk, and infant oral swabs and feces displayed identical RAPD profiles. All of them, independently from the mother and child pair, were identified as Lactobacillus gasseri. Similarly, among coccoid lactic acid bacteria from these different sources, some shared an identical RAPD pattern and were identified as Enterococcus faecium. In contrast, none of the lactic acid bacteria isolated from breast skin shared RAPD profiles with lactic acid bacteria of the other sources.Conclusions Breast-feeding can be a significant source of lactic acid bacteria to the infant gut. Lactic acid bacteria present in milk may have an endogenous origin and may not be the result of contamination from the surrounding breast skin.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpeds.2003.09.028

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martín, R., Langa, S., Reviriego, C., Jimínez, E., Marín, M. L., Xaus, J., Fernández, L., & Rodríguez, J. M.
Affiliations
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
Corresponding author
Rodríguez, Juan M
Venue
The Journal of Pediatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-12
Volume
143
Issue
6
Pages
754-758
ISSN
0022-3476 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1977313258
Cited by
792
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 64 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 34
FWCI
8.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
Keywords
breast milk, lactic acid bacteria, probiotics, synbiotics, breastfeeding, infant gut microbiota, Lactobacillus gasseri, Enterococcus faecium, breast skin, RAPD profiling, 16S rRNA gene sequencing
MeSH terms
Breast, Feces, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Intestines, Lactobacillus, Milk, Human, Mouth Mucosa, Random Allocation, Skin, Vagina, Probiotics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review