Sympathetic control of short-term heart rate variability and its pharmacological modulation.
Abstract
The static relationship between heart rate (HR) and the activity of either vagal or sympathetic nerves is roughly linear within the physiological range of HR variations. The dynamic control of HR by autonomic nerves is characterized by a fixed time delay between the onset of changes in nerve activity and the onset of changes in HR. This delay is much longer for sympathetically than for vagally mediated changes in HR. In addition, the kinetics of the HR responses shows the properties of a low‐pass filter with short (vagal) and long (sympathetic) time constants. These differences might be secondary to differences in nervous conduction times, width of synaptic cleft, kinetics of receptor activation and post‐receptor events. Because of the accentuated low‐pass filter characteristics of the HR response to sympathetic modulation, sympathetic influences are almost restricted to the very‐low‐frequency component of HR variability, but the chronotropic effects of vagal stimulation usually predominate over those of sympathetic stimulation in this frequency band. Oscillations in cardiac sympathetic nerve activity are not involved in respiratory sinus arrhythmia (high‐frequency component) and make a minor contribution to HR oscillations of approximately 10‐s period (low‐frequency component of approximately 0.1 Hz), at least in the supine position. In the latter case, HR oscillations are derived mainly from a baroreflex, vagally mediated response to blood pressure Mayer waves. Beta‐blockers and centrally acting sympathoinhibitory drugs share the ability to improve the baroreflex control of HR, possibly through vagal facilitation, which might be beneficial in several cardiovascular diseases.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Respiratory sinus arrhythmia is greatly exaggerated at slower respiratory frequencies as the difference between peak and trough heart rates is maximized.
“This phenomenon is known clinically as respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA), and is greatly exaggerated at slower respiratory frequencies as the difference between peak and trough heart rates is maximized (Bertram et al., 1998; Julien, 2006; Elghozi and Julien, 2007).”
From Hypothesis: Pulmonary Afferent Activity Patterns During Slow, Deep Breathing Contribute to the Neural Induction of Physiological Relaxation (2019) · cites this paper as Elghozi and Julien, 2007
Cites
Hayano, J., Yasuma, F., Okada, A., Mukai, S., & Fujinami, T. (1996) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.94.4.842 · Cited by 332 · see citing works
Respiratory sinus arrhythmia in the denervated human heart
Bernardi, L., Keller, F., Sanders, M., Reddy, P. S., Griffith, B., Meno, F., & Pinsky, M. R. (1989) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.1989.67.4.1447 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Dynamic nonlinear vago-sympathetic interaction in regulating heart rate
Sunagawa, K., Kawada, T., & Nakahara, T. (1998) · Heart and Vessels · doi:10.1007/bf01745040 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Summer-Winter Differences in 24 h Variability of Heart Rate
Kristal-Boneh, E., Froom, P., Harari, G., Malik, M., & Ribak, J. (2000) · European Journal of Cardiovascular Risk · doi:10.1177/204748730000700209 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The physiological effects of slow breathing in the healthy human
Russo, M. A., Santarelli, D. M., & O’Rourke, D. (2017) · Breathe · doi:10.1183/20734735.009817 · Cited by 665 · see citing works
“Sympathetic bursts do occur when the gate is open during expiration, however, there is a much greater response lag compared to parasympathetic action, and they are also less effective the greater the vagal activity due to suppression of noradrenaline release and effect [39, 95, 96, 98].”
BackgroundEverything Hertz: methodological issues in short-term frequency-domain HRV.
Heathers, J. A. J. (2014) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2014.00177 · Cited by 322 · see citing works
Heart rate variability analysis: physiological foundations and main methods
Institute of Biomedical Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Baevsky, R. М., & Chernikova, A. G. (2017) · Cardiometry · doi:10.12710/cardiometry.2017.10.6676 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Noble, D. J., & Hochman, S. (2019) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2019.01176 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
- Authors
- Elghozi, J., & Julien, C.
- Affiliations
- Inserm (FR)
- Lyon 1 Université (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Elghozi, Jean‐Luc
- Venue
- Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-04-20
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 337-347
- ISSN
- 0767-3981 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-8206
- OpenAlex
- W2076075789
- Cited by
- 97
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 0.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Fundamental and Clinical Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
- Keywords
- heart rate variability, sympathetic nervous system, vagal control, respiratory sinus arrhythmia, baroreflex, Mayer waves, beta-blockers, chronotropic effect
- MeSH terms
- Adrenergic beta-Antagonists, Animals, Blood Pressure, Heart, Heart Rate, Humans, Models, Cardiovascular, Oscillometry, Sympathetic Nervous System, Vagus Nerve, Baroreflex
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review