Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 163

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

THE VOICE OF THE CHAFFINCH AND ITS FUNCTION AS A LANGUAGE

Marler, P.·1956·Ibis

Abstract

Summary.: The voice of the Chaffinch has been studied by making recordings and analysing them on a sonograph. The contexts in which each call is given are described. The 14 basic calls are flight, social, aggressive and injury calls, three alarm calls, subsong and song, three courtship calls and the begging calls of nestlings and fledglings. With their variations they give 21 different signals. The ontogeny of certain calls and the occurrence of intermediate forms suggest how voice may have evolved in the Chaffinch. A hypothetical ancestral type agrees with certain Cardueline finches, implying a closer relationship than recent anatomical studies suggest. Unlike many displays, calls often occur without an obvious conflict in motivation. The voice of Chaffinches reared in isolation is usually normal, but song is usually abnormal and in nature is perfected by learning from other birds. The social call is sometimes abnormal and may sometimes be modified by learning under natural conditions. The communicatory function of voice has been assessed by studying the responses of other Chaffinches to it. By comparison with other contexts in which the same response occurs, a list of “information received” is constructed. The recipient responds as though this has been received. Four general types of information are involved, social and environmental, identifying and locating. Inter‐specific communication occurs with other woodland Passerines, especially through alarm calls. The alarm calls are of a type difficult for predators to locate. Different families have independently evolved the same type of call for this purpose. Other alarm calls of many species, used to draw attention to the position of a predator, are adapted to be easy to locate. The general structure of many calls can be understood in terms of the need to facilitate or hinder location of the calling bird. There are other factors governing the form of voice, especially the need to differ from the calls of other sympatric species. This only applies to calls communicating certain types of information. Some of those exempt from this need for divergence may be especially useful in phylogenetic study. The two main types of response to voice are related to the different types of information conveyed by the calls. Mechanisms of response are discussed, and the differences between the languages of the Chaffinch and of man.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1474-919x.1956.tb03042.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Authors
Marler, P.
Venue
Ibis
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1956-04
Volume
98
Issue
2
Pages
231-261
ISSN
  • 0019-1019 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-919X
OpenAlex
W2001423713
Cited by
163
References
0
FWCI
5.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE VOICE OF THE CHAFFINCH AND ITS FUNCTION AS A LANGUAGE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1474-919x.1956.tb03042.x
The paper
Marler, P. (1956). THE VOICE OF THE CHAFFINCH AND ITS FUNCTION AS A LANGUAGE. Ibis. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919x.1956.tb03042.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.