The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Behavioral, physical, and demographic changes in Drosophila populations through dietary restriction
Abstract
Summary: Dietary restriction (DR) is a valuable experimental tool for studying the aging process. Primary advancement of research in this area has relied on rodent models, but attention has recently turned toward Drosophila melanogaster. However, little is known about the baseline effects of DR on wild‐type Drosophila and continued experimentation requires such information. The findings described here survey the effects of DR on inbred, wild‐type populations of Canton‐S fruit flies and demonstrate a robust effect of diet on longevity. Over a circumscribed range of dietary conditions, healthy lifespan varies by as much as 121% for wild‐type Drosophila females. Significant differences are also observed for male flies, but the magnitude of the DR effect is less robust. Mortality analyses of the survivorship data reveal that this variation in lifespan can be attributed to a modulation of the rate parameter for the mortality function – a change in the demographic rate of aging. Since the feeding of fruit flies is less easily controlled than that of rodents, this research also addresses the validity of applying a DR model to Drosophila populations. Feeding and body weight data for flies given the various dietary conditions surveyed indicate that Drosophila on higher‐calorie diets consume a similar volume of food to those on a low‐calorie diet, resulting in different levels of calorie intake. Fertility and activity levels demonstrate that the diets surveyed are comparable, and that increasing the calorie content of laboratory food up to twice the normal concentration is not pathologic for experimental fly populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Influences of Aging and Dietary Restriction on Serum Thymosin l Levels in Mice
Weindruch, R., Naylor, P. H., Goldstein, A. L., & Walford, R. L. (1988) · Journal of Gerontology · doi:10.1093/geronj/43.2.b40 · Cited by 207
Cited by
Sexual selection, sexual conflict and the evolution of ageing and life span
Bonduriansky, R., Maklakov, A., Zajitschek, F., & Brooks, R. (2008) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01417.x · Cited by 542
Dietary composition specifies consumption, obesity, and lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster
Skorupa, D. A., Dervisefendic, A., Zwiener, J., & Pletcher, S. D. (2008) · Aging Cell · doi:10.1111/j.1474-9726.2008.00400.x · Cited by 437
Chen, K., Luan, X., Liu, Q., Wang, J., Chang, X., Snijders, A. M., Mao, J.-H., Secombe, J., Dan, Z., Chen, J.-H., et al. (2019) · Cell Host & Microbe · doi:10.1016/j.chom.2019.02.003 · Cited by 208
APOE2 is associated with longevity independent of Alzheimer’s disease
Shinohara, M., Kanekiyo, T., Tachibana, M., Kurti, A., Shinohara, M., Fu, Y., Zhao, J., Han, X., Sullivan, P. M., Rebeck, G. W., et al. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.62199 · Cited by 82
Jiang, N., Du, G., Tobias, E., Wood, J. G., Whitaker, R., Neretti, N., & Helfand, S. L. (2013) · Aging · doi:10.18632/aging.100614 · Cited by 54
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bross, T. G., Rogina, B., & Helfand, S. L.
- Venue
- Aging Cell
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-11-07
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 309-317
- ISSN
- 1474-9718 (ISSN-L)
- 1474-9726
- OpenAlex
- W2149403100
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Behavioral, physical, and demographic changes in Drosophila populations through dietary restriction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1474-9726.2005.00181.x
- The paper
- Bross, T. G., Rogina, B., & Helfand, S. L. (2005). Behavioral, physical, and demographic changes in Drosophila populations through dietary restriction. Aging Cell. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-9726.2005.00181.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.