Cited by 103

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The aged microenvironment contributes to the age-related functional defects of CD4 T cells in mice

Lefebvre, Julie S., Maue, Alexander C., Eaton, Sheri M., Lanthier, Paula A., Tighe, Michael, Haynes, Laura·2012·Aging Cell

Abstract

Summary: CD4 T cells, and especially T follicular helper cells, are critical for the generation of a robust humoral response to an infection or vaccination. Importantly, immunosenescence affects CD4 T‐cell function, and the accumulation of intrinsic defects decreases the cognate helper functions of these cells. However, much less is known about the contribution of the aged microenvironment to this impaired CD4 T‐cell response. In this study, we have employed a preclinical model to determine whether the aged environment contributes to the defects in CD4 T‐cell functions with aging. Using an adoptive transfer model in mice, we demonstrate for the first time that the aged microenvironment negatively impacts at least three steps of the CD4 T‐cell response to antigenic stimulation. First, the recruitment of CD4 T cells to the spleen is reduced in aged compared to young hosts, which correlates with dysregulated chemokine expression in the aged organ. Second, the priming of CD4 T cells by DCs is reduced in aged compared to young mice. Finally, naïve CD4 T cells show a reduced transition to a T follicular helper cell phenotype in the aged environment, which impairs the subsequent generation of germinal centers. These studies have provided new insights into how aging impacts the immune system and how these changes influence the development of immunity to infections or vaccinations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2012.00836.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The microenvironment contributes to the age-related functional defects of CD4 T cells in mice.

    “The microenvironment contributes to the age-related functional defects of CD4 T cells, as assessed by using an adoptive transfer model in mice (Lefebvre et al., 2012).”

    From The Hallmarks of Aging (2013) · cites this paper as Lefebvre et al., 2012

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. 10.1038/ni1100 · DOI
  2. 10.1046/j.1440-1711.1998.00709.x · DOI
  3. 10.1084/jem.192.11.1545 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.03.023 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.cellimm.2011.04.010 · DOI
  6. 10.1146/annurev-immunol-031210-101400 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1084/jem.20041395 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80059-8 · DOI
  9. 10.1084/jem.189.3.451 · DOI
  10. 10.1084/jem.20041933 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.mad.2010.08.003 · DOI
  12. 10.4049/jimmunol.175.11.7109 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.03.024 · DOI
  14. Laszlo G, 1993, Characterization of a novel cell‐surface molecule expressed on subpopulations of activated T and B cells, J. Immunol., 150, 5252, 10.4049/jimmunol.150.12.5252 · DOI
  15. 10.2174/1876326X01206010083 · DOI
  16. 10.1084/jem.187.4.655 · DOI
  17. 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2005.00266.x · DOI
  18. 10.1073/pnas.97.23.12694 · DOI
  19. 10.4049/jimmunol.0804226 · DOI
  20. 10.1084/jem.193.2.207 · DOI
  21. 10.1126/science.1144830 · DOI
  22. 10.1084/jem.20021801 · DOI
  23. 10.1084/jem.20030169 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.mad.2011.03.005 · DOI
  25. 10.1093/infdis/jir048 · DOI
  26. 10.1038/416094a · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2007.05.011 · DOI
  28. 10.1084/jem.192.11.1553 · DOI
  29. 10.4049/jimmunol.177.12.8348 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.jim.2006.01.022 · DOI
  31. 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2009.03182.x · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.exger.2009.11.005 · DOI
  33. 10.4049/jimmunol.0903505 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lefebvre, J. S., Maue, A. C., Eaton, S. M., Lanthier, P. A., Tighe, M., & Haynes, L.
Venue
Aging Cell
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-06-11
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
732-740
ISSN
  • 1474-9718
  • 1474-9726
Cited by
103
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review