Cited by 50Agricultural Science and FertilizationSustainable Agricultural Systems AnalysisSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics

Modelling of soil nutrient budgets: an assessment of agricultural sustainability in Nepal

Brown, S., Schreier, H., Shah, P.B., Lavkulich, L.M.·1999·Soil Use and Management

Abstract

Abstract. Sustaining soil fertility under agricultural intensification and expansion onto marginal lands is a significant challenge in the Nepalese Middle Mountains. In a detailed watershed study it was shown that the overall soil fertility is poor, forest soils display the poorest conditions as a result of biomass removal, and sustaining agriculture is questionable due to the transformation from traditional to multiple cropping systems. Parent material is a significant factor influencing low phosphorus status while insufficient inputs create deficiencies in total carbon, nitrogen and bases. A nutrient budget model was developed to assess inputs, redistribution and losses relative to soil fertility. Yield, input and management data obtained from farm interviews, and soil analysis data were used in the calculation of nutrient budgets. Results from modelling indicate declining soil fertility under rainfed agriculture, forest and rangelands, and marginal conditions under irrigated agriculture subject to intensive cultivation. Nutrient deficits were relatively low for irrigated rice‐wheat systems, which benefit from nutrient inputs via sediments and irrigation waters, but the introduction of triple cropping showed greater deficits. Nutrient balances were most critical under rainfed maize production where 94% of the farms were in deficit. Current shortages of organic matter make elimination of nutrient deficits problematic but improvement of composting, biological N‐fixation and fertilizer efficiency and reducing erosion were found to be potential options.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1475-2743.1999.tb00072.x

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brown, S., Schreier, H., Shah, P. B., & Lavkulich, L. M.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (NP)
Corresponding author
Brown, S.
Venue
Soil Use and Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-06
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
101-108
ISSN
  • 0266-0032 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2743
OpenAlex
W2005142473
Cited by
50
References
12
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Soil Use and Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Keywords
soil fertility, sustainable agriculture, nutrient balance, nutritional deficiency, rainfed maize, triple cropping, marginal land, forest soils, rangeland, parent material, phosphorus deficiency, organic matter, composting, nitrogen fixation, fertilizer use efficiency, soil erosion, watershed research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review