Cited by 41Agricultural Science and FertilizationSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil Management and Crop Yield

Maintaining soil fertility under increasing land use pressure in the Middle Mountains of Nepal

Schreier, H., Shah, P.B., Lavkulich, L.M., Brown, S.·1994·Soil Use and Management

Abstract

Abstract. Nepal is facing a serious problem of being unable to maintain soil fertility in agriculture and forestry. Land use practices initiated over the past 10–15 years have resulted in insufficient nutrient inputs, while biomass use and production have increased. Changes in forest soil fertility have resulted from intensive use of forest biomass for animal feed and collection of forest litter for use in agriculture. The agricultural fertility changes have resulted from intensifying annual crop rotations from 1.5 to 2.5 crops and insufficient inputs. The removal of biomass from the forest has curtailed the natural organic cycle by virtually eliminating nutrient inputs. The soils are very acidic and have little C, N, P and exchangeable bases, but have large amounts of active iron. Basic nutrients are not sustained in agriculture and differences in inputs and management between irrigated and rainfed agricultural systems are becoming visible. Irrigated fields show the largest cation content because of input from irrigation water. Rainfed agricultural sites, which receive the most nutrients (fertilizers and manure), have the highest pH values and C and N contents. All soil fertility conditions are marginal and put into question the long‐term sustainability of current levels of production. Alterations in the cropping intensity are needed and the introduction of nitrogen fixing trees and crops seems to be the most viable option towards sustainability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1475-2743.1994.tb00474.x

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schreier, H., Shah, P. B., Lavkulich, L. M., & Brown, S.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (NP)
Venue
Soil Use and Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-09
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
137-142
ISSN
  • 0266-0032 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2743
OpenAlex
W2120678301
Cited by
41
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Soil Use and Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
Keywords
soil fertility, land use change, forest soil fertility, biomass removal, nutrient inputs, soil acidity, exchangeable cations, active iron, soil organic carbon, soil nitrogen, rainfed agriculture, cropping intensity, nitrogen-fixing trees, sustainable agriculture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review