Cited by 130Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil erosion and sediment transportSoil Management and Crop Yield

Simulation of soil organic carbon stocks in a Mediterranean olive grove under different soil‐management systems using the RothC model

Nieto, O. M., Castro, J., Fernández, E., Smith, P.·2010·Soil Use and Management

Abstract

Agricultural soils play a very important role in regulating the carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) content of the atmosphere, and can behave either as carbon sources or sinks. We have simulated the dynamics of carbon in the soil under different land uses and soil‐management systems in a Mediterranean olive grove with the Rothamsted carbon (RothC) model. To this end we chose patches of native vegetation (NV) and two different olive grove soils (chromic calcisols and calcic vertisols) under different soil‐management systems: conventional tillage (T), and mulching with shredded olive‐pruning debris and residues from olive‐fruit cleaning (PD + CR). We measured the clay content, bulk density, soil organic carbon (SOC) and total nitrogen (N) in each patch. The SOC and N values decreased by more than 30% as a result of a change in soil use from NV to T olive grove. After adding PD + CR these values rose once more, even to levels above NV. The RothC model performed well for covered soils (NV and PD + CR) but overestimated the SOC values after the soil use was changed from NV to T olive grove, probably due to high carbon losses caused by erosion, common to T soils in the Mediterranean basin. As a result of mulching the soil with only pruning debris, CO 2 emitted to the atmosphere was reduced by >55% for both soils. Associated with this decrease in the emission rate, RothC estimated a potential carbon sequestration of 0.5 and 0.6 t C/ha/yr for chromic calcisols and calcic vertisols, respectively. The reuse of organic debris generated in the olive grove, such as pruning debris and residues from olive‐fruit cleaning, is an efficient way of improving soil properties, diminishing CO 2 emissions and increasing the soil’s capacity to store carbon.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1475-2743.2010.00265.x

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Authors have modified and coupled RothC by adding and calibrating new specific soil and residue C pools, accounting for tree and crop residues.

    “Authors have modified and coupled RothC by adding and calibrating new specific soil and residue C pools, accounting for tree [164] and crop [165] residues.”
  • Variation in bulk density increases uncertainty of stock changes and needs to be accounted for to capture spatial heterogeneity effects on SOC dynamics and sequestration.

    “Bulk density in particular is a dynamic property when changing from arable to perennial agricultural systems [24], and its variation increases the uncertainty of stock changes [80, 164, 184] and needs to be accounted for to capture the effect of spatial heterogeneity on SOC dynamics and sequestration.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nieto, O. M., Castro, J., Fernández, E., & Smith, P.
Affiliations
  • Andalusian Institute of Agricultural and Fisheries Research and Training (ES)
  • Universidad de Granada (ES)
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
Corresponding author
Nieto, O. M.
Venue
Soil Use and Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-05-18
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
118-125
ISSN
  • 0266-0032 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2743
OpenAlex
W1948322064
Cited by
130
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
FWCI
10.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Soil Use and Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
Keywords
soil organic carbon, RothC model, olive groves, soil management, mulching, conventional tillage, carbon sequestration, CO2 emissions, soil erosion, soil carbon dynamics, Mediterranean agriculture, land use change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review