The DOI matches its Crossref record.
QUANTIFICATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF LIPID IN ARCHAEOLOGICAL CERAMICS: IMPLICATIONS FOR SAMPLING POTSHERDS FOR ORGANIC RESIDUE ANALYSIS AND THE CLASSIFICATION OF VESSEL USE
Abstract
Organic residue analysis has been performed on 62 reconstructed vessels from a single archaeological site (Rounds, Northamptonshire, U.K.). In order to establish regions of lipid accumulation within a vessel, sherds were sampled from different parts of a vessel, for example base, body and rim, and submitted to lipid extraction procedures. The techniques of high‐temperature gas chromatography (GC) and GC/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) were then used to analyse the sherd lipid extracts. The quantitative results obtained show differential accumulation and preservation of lipid in various parts of the same vessel. This latter observation has serious implications for the sampling of potsherds for organic residue analysis. Furthermore, the amount of absorbed lipid varies quite considerably between vessel types. On this basis, a new method is proposed for classifying vessel use by comparing the concentration of lipid present in different parts of individual vessels.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The external surfaces of potsherds were removed with a modelling drill to exclude any exogenous lipids, as per established protocols.
“The external surfaces of potsherds (n = 179) were removed with a modelling drill to exclude any exogenous lipids, as per established protocols [102].”
From Identifying pastoral and plant products in local and imported pottery in Early Bronze Age southeastern Arabia (2025) · cites this paper as [102]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- Biek L., 1963, Archaeology and the microscope
- 10.2307/278316 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1475-4754.1993.tb01025.x · DOI
- Deal M., 1988, A pot for all reasons: ceramic ecology revisited, 5
- Ericson J. E., 1972, Research design: the relationships between the primary functions and the physical properties of ceramic vessels and their implications for ceramic distributions on archaeological sites, Anthropology UCLA, 3, 84
- 10.1039/an9901501339 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0003598X00080145 · DOI
- Evershed R. P., 1992, New developments in archaeological science, 187
- Evershed R. P., 1992, Organic residues in archaeology: their identification and analysis, 11
- 10.1016/0305-4403(91)90027-M · DOI · Paper page
- Heron C., 1991, Archaeological sciences 1989: proceedings of a conference on archaeological sciences, 325
- Heron C., 1991, Archaeological sciences 1989: proceedings of a conference on archaeological sciences, 332
- Heron C., 1993, Archaeological method and theory 5
- McGovern P. E., 1984, Royal purple and the pre‐Phoenician dye industry of Lebanon, MASCA J., 3, 64
- Rice P. M., 1987, Pottery analysis: a sourcebook
- 10.1016/0165-2370(91)80073-H · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Earliest Date for Milk Use in the Near East and Southeastern Europe Linked to Cattle Herding
Evershed, R. P., Payne, S., Sherratt, A. G., Copley, M. S., Coolidge, J., Urem-Kotsu, D., Kotsakis, K., Özdoğan, M., Özdoğan, A. E., Nieuwenhuyse, O., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07180 · Cited by 681
Self-citationDid the first farmers of central and eastern Europe produce dairy foods?
Craig, O. E., Chapman, J., Heron, C., Willis, L. H., Bartosiewicz, L., Taylor, G., Whittle, A., & Collins, M. (2005) · Antiquity · doi:10.1017/s0003598x00115017 · Cited by 188
Ancient Biomolecules and Evolutionary Inference
Cappellini, E., Prohaska, A., Racimo, F., Welker, F., Pedersen, M. W., Allentoft, M. E., de Barros Damgaard, P., Gutenbrunner, P., Dunne, J., Hammann, S., et al. (2018) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-062917-012002 · Cited by 118
Self-citationSuryanarayan, A., Méry, S., Swerida, J., Esposti, M. D., Dollarhide, E., Döpper, S., Douglas, K. A., Eddisford, D., Al-Jahwari, N. S., Mazuy, A., et al. (2025) · PLOS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0324661 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- CHARTERS, S., EVERSHED, R. P., GOAD, L. J., LEYDEN, A., BLINKHORN, P. W., & DENHAM, V.
- Venue
- Archaeometry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-08
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 211-223
- ISSN
- 0003-813X
- 1475-4754
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
