Cited by 266

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

THE CHALLENGE OF ‘TECHNOLOGICAL CHOICES’FOR MATERIALS SCIENCE APPROACHES IN ARCHAEOLOGY*

SILLAR, B., TITE, M. S.·2000·Archaeometry

Abstract

Recently several anthropological and sociological studies have interpreted technologies as cultural choices that are determined as much by local perceptions and the social context fly any material constraints or purely functional criteria. Using the example of ceramic technology we consider how materials science studies can contribute to and benefit from this understanding of technology as a social construct. Although we acknowledge some potential difficulties, it is our contention that both materials scientists and archaeologists have gained much and have much to gain by cooperating together to study ancient technologies, and that the concept of ‘technological choices’can facilitate a wider consideration of the factors shaping technological developments.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1475-4754.2000.tb00863.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 68

  1. Arnold D. E., 1985, Ceramic theory and cultural process
  2. 10.1017/CBO9780511598395 · DOI
  3. Bijker W., 1987, The social construction of technological systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology
  4. 10.1017/CBO9780511812507 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.2307/280396 · DOI
  6. Childe V. G., 1956, Society and knowledge
  7. Cort L. Lefferts L. andReith C. 1997 ‘Before’ paddle‐and‐anvil: contributions from contemporary mainland southeast Asia unpubl. paper presented at the ‘Ceramic technology and production’ conference British Museum London.
  8. Costin C. L., 1991, Archaeological method and theory: 3, 1
  9. Cresswell R., 1972, Langues et techniques, nature et société II: approche ethnologique, approche naturaliste, 21
  10. Cresswell R., 1976, Avant‐propos, Techniques et Culture, 1, 5
  11. Cresswell R., 1990, ‘A new technology’ revisited, Archaeol, Rev. Cambridge, 9, 39
  12. 10.1007/BF02231876 · DOI
  13. Dobres M.‐A., 1999, The social dynamics of technology: practice, politics, and world views
  14. Earle T., 1981, Comment on Rice, ‘Evolution of specialized pottery production: a trial model’, Curr. Anthropol, 22, 230
  15. 10.2307/280784 · DOI
  16. Giddens A., 1984, The constitution of society: outline of a theory of structuration
  17. 10.1016/0305-4403(92)90014-T · DOI
  18. Gosselain O. P., 1995, The aim of laboratory analyses of ceramics in archaeology, 147
  19. Henderson J., 1996, From River Trent to Raqqa, 59
  20. Hill J., 1997, The individual in prehistory
  21. 10.1016/0305-4403(95)90011-X · DOI
  22. Hodder L, 1986, Reading the past: current approaches to interpretation in archaeology
  23. Ingold T., 1988, Tools, minds, and machines: an excursion in the philosophy of technology, Techniques et Culture, 12, 151
  24. Ingold T., 1990, Society, nature and the concept of technology, Archaeol. Rev. Cambridge, 9, 5
  25. Jones M. U., 1973, Romano‐British pottery kilns from Mucking, Essex, Trans. Essex Archaeol. Soc., 5, 13
  26. Jones A. 1997 A biography of ceramics: food and culture in late Neolithic Orkney unpubl Ph.D Thesis Univ. Glasgow.
  27. Latour B. 1991 Technology is society made durable in Law 1991 105–31. · DOI
  28. Latour B., 1996, Aramis or the love of technology
  29. Law J., 1991, A sociology of monsters: essays on power, technology and domination
  30. Lechtman H., 1977, Material culture: style, organization, and dynamics of technology, 3
  31. Lechtman H., 1979, Pre‐Columbian metallurgy of South America, 1
  32. 10.1016/0278-4165(86)90012-7 · DOI
  33. Lemonnier P., 1992, Museum of Anthropology Anthropol Pap 88
  34. Lemonnier P., 1993, Technological choices: transformations in material cultures since the Neolithic, 1
  35. Leroi‐Gourhan A., 1964, Le geste et la parole I: techniques et langage
  36. Leroi‐Gourhan A., 1965, Le geste et la parole II: la mémoire el les rythmes
  37. Lyne M. A. B., 1979, The Alice Holt/Farnham Roman pottery industry
  38. Miller D., 1987, Material culture and mass consumption
  39. Nicholson P. T., 1995, Recent excavations at an ancient Egyptian glassworks: Tell el‐Amarna 1993, Glass Technol., 36, 125
  40. Nicholson P. T., 1998, The prehistory and history of glassmaking technology, 105
  41. Peacock D P. S., 1982, Pottery in the Roman world: an ethnoarchaeological approach
  42. Peacock D. P S., 1986, Amphorae and the Roman economy; an introduction guide
  43. 10.2307/2802804 · DOI
  44. 10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002423 · DOI
  45. 10.1086/202661 · DOI
  46. Rice P. M., 1987, Pottery analysis: a sourcebook
  47. Rice P. M., 1991, The ceramic legacy of Anna O. Shepard, 257
  48. Rye O. S, 1981, Pottery technology: principles and reconstructions
  49. Schiffer M. B., 1975, Behavioural chain analysis: activities, organization, and the use of space, Fieldania, 65, 103
  50. Schiffer M. B., 1992, Technological perspectives on behavioural change
  51. Schiffer M. B., 1996, Learning from things, 73
  52. 10.1086/203601 · DOI
  53. 10.2307/282378 · DOI
  54. 1990, Technology in the humanities, Archaeol. Rev. Cambridge, 9, 1
  55. Shimada I., 1994, Teconologia y Organizacion de la Production de Ceramica Prehispanica en los Andes, 67
  56. Shortland A. J. 1998 Early vitreous materials at Amarna unpubl. D.Phil Thesis Univ. Oxford.
  57. Sigaut F., 1994, Companion encyclopedia of anthropology, 420
  58. 10.1177/135918359600100301 · DOI
  59. Sillar B., 1997, Not so much a pot, more a way of life: current approaches to artefact analysis in archaeology, 1
  60. Stark M. T., 1998, The archaeology of social boundaries
  61. Steponaitis V. P., 1984, The many dimensions of pottery: ceramics in archaeology and anthropology, 79
  62. Swan V. G., 1984, The pottery kilns of Roman Britain
  63. Tite M S., 1988, Science and archaeology Glasgow 1987, 9
  64. Leeuw S. E., 1984, The many dimensions of pottery: ceramics in archaeology and anthropology, 707
  65. Leeuw S. E., 1991, Ceramic ethnoarchaeology, 11
  66. Leeuw S. E., 1993, Technological choices: transformations in material cultures since the Neolithic, 238
  67. Leeuw S. E., 1989, What's new? A closer look at the process of innovation
  68. Leeuw S. E., 1991, Technical traditions and unquestioned assumptions: the case of pottery in Michoacan, Techniques et Culture, 17, 145

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 266

Metadata

Authors
SILLAR, B., & TITE, M. S.
Venue
Archaeometry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-02
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
2-20
ISSN
  • 0003-813X
  • 1475-4754
Cited by
266
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review