Cited by 47

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A STUDY OF OBSIDIAN SOURCE USAGE IN THE CENTRAL ANDES OF ARGENTINA AND CHILE

GIESSO, M., DURÁN, V., NEME, G., GLASCOCK, M. D., CORTEGOSO, V., GIL, A., SANHUEZA, L.·2011·Archaeometry

Abstract

We present the results of XRF analysis for 428 obsidian samples from archaeological sites in the Argentinian province of Mendoza and from central Chile. The archaeological samples come from different environments and have dates that range from 9000 to 300 bp. The results indicate that all known sources were utilized; however, the beginnings and the intensities of their exploitation were variable. On the contrary, strong differences appear, especially between the Cordilleran and the non-Cordillera sources. We suggest that this pattern is mainly related to differences in the accessibility, quality and abundance of the obsidian in the sources.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1475-4754.2010.00555.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Five Andean obsidian sources with different geological and topographical properties have been recognized.

    “This work has allowed recognizing five Andean sources with different geological and topographical properties (Dur an et al., 2004;Giesso et al., 2011).”
  • The macro-regional obsidian archaeological record is dominated by two large high-altitude sources: Las Cargas and Laguna del Maule.

    “The macro-regional obsidian archaeological record is dominated by two large high-altitude sources: Las Cargas and Laguna del Maule (Seelenfreund et al., 1996;Dur an et al., 2004;Giesso et al., 2011;Cortegoso et al., 2014b).”
  • In the early stage, the northernmost area records only human use of Arroyo Paramillos obsidian on the western slope of the Andes along the Maipo River, plus a minimal presence in high-altitude sites in northern Mendoza during the mid-Holocene; the Laguna del Diamante chemical type is not recorded during this early interval.

    “In this early stage, in the northernmost area we only record the human use of Arroyo Paramillos obsidian in the western slope of Andes along the Maipo River (Dur an et al., 2012;Cortegoso et al., 2012b), as well as a minimal presence in high altitude sites northern Mendoza during the mid-Holocene (Giesso et al., 2011).The Laguna del Diamante chemical type is not recorded during this early interval”
  • Other sources were used much more in terms of intensity and spatial scale of transport in both watersheds of the Andes; this is the case for Las Cargas compared to Laguna del Diamante and Laguna del Maule compared to Cerro Huenul.

    “When information on the sources analyzed here is visualized in the context of the data for all the available sources in the macro- region (Dur an et al., 2004;De Francesco et al., 2006;Giesso et al., 2011;Dur an et al., 2012;Cortegoso et al., 2012a), it is evident that other sources were used much more in terms of intensity and spatial scale of transport in both watersheds of the Andes.This is the”
  • Currently available data allows suggesting that human societies from the deserts of southern Mendoza (La Payunia) favored a west-east vector of mobility, connecting with Laguna del Maule source, in detriment of movements towards the south and southeast, connecting with Cerro Huenul.

    “Currently available data allows suggesting that human societies from the deserts of southern Mendoza (La Payunia) favored a west-east vector of mobility, connecting with Laguna del Maule source, in detriment of movements towards the south and southeast, connecting with Cerro Huenul (Giesso et al., 2011).”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. Bárcena, 2001, Historia Argentina prehispánica, 561
  2. Bellot-Gurlet, 2008, Obsidian provenance studies in Colombia and Ecuador: obsidian sources revisited, Journal of Archaeological Science, 35, 272, 10.1016/j.jas.2007.03.008 · DOI
  3. Borrero, 2002, Entre montañas y desiertos: arqueología del sur de Mendoza, 195
  4. Burger, 2000, Through the glass darkly: prehispanic obsidian procurement and exchange in southern Peru and northern Bolivia, Journal of World Prehistory, 14, 267, 10.1023/A:1026509726643 · DOI
  5. Cabrera, 1976, Regiones fitogeográficas argentinas
  6. Chiavazza, 2004, De la cordillera a la llanura: disponibilidad regional de recursos líticos y organización de la tecnología en el norte de Mendoza, Argentina, Chungará, 723
  7. Cornejo, 2003, The end of the Pleistocene in central Chile: evidence of economic and cultural diversity, Current Research in the Pleistocene, 20, 12
  8. Cornejo, 2003, Coexistencia de cazadores recolectores y horticultores tempranos en la cordillera andina de Chile central, Latin American Antiquity, 14, 389, 10.2307/3557575 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Cortegoso, 2004b, Mid-Holocene hunters in the Andes mountains: environments, resources and technological strategies, Quaternary International, 132, 71, 10.1016/j.quaint.2004.07.016 · DOI · Paper page
  10. De Francesco, 2006, Arqueología y ambiente de áreas naturales protegidas de la Provincia de Mendoza, 53
  11. Dieguez, 2004, Cronoestratigrafía del sitio Rincón del Atuel-1 (San Rafael, Mendoza): formación del sitio y ocupación humana, Interseccionesen Antropología, 5, 71
  12. Durán, 2000, Poblaciones indígenas de Malargüe. Su arqueología e historia
  13. Durán, 2006, Arqueología y ambiente de áreas naturales protegidas de la Provincia de Mendoza, 81
  14. Durán, 2004, Estudios de redes de aprovisionamiento y redes de distribución de obsidiana durante el Holoceno Tardío en el sur de Mendoza (Argentina), Estudios Atacameños, 28, 25
  15. Falabella, 1989, Culturas prehistóricas de Chile (desde sus orígenes hasta los albores de la conquista), 295
  16. García, 2004, Los primeros pobladores de Los Andes Centrales Argentinos
  17. García, 1999, The Pleistocene-Holocene transition and human occupation in the Central Andes of Argentina: Agua de la Cueva locality, Quaternary International, 53/54, 43, 10.1016/S1040-6182(98)00006-8 · DOI
  18. García, 2001, Ocupaciones tempranas de ‘El Manzano 1’ (Región Metropolitana): Campamento arcaico o paradero paleoindio?, Boletín de la Sociedad Chilena de Arqueología, 31, 65
  19. Giesso, 2008, Obsidian in western Pampas, Argentina: source characterization and provisioning strategies, Bulletin of the International Association of Obsidian Studies, 37, 15
  20. Gil, 2002, Entre montañas y desiertos. Arqueología del sur mendocino, 103
  21. Gil, 2003, Zea mays on the South American periphery: chronology and dietary importance, Current Anthropology, 44, 295, 10.1086/367972 · DOI
  22. Gil, 2006, Arqueología de La Payunia (Mendoza, Argentina): el poblamiento humano en los márgenes de la agricultura, 10.30861/9781841719122 · DOI
  23. Gil, 2006, Arqueología y ambiente de áreas naturales protegidas de la Provincia de Mendoza, 61, 163
  24. Gil, 2005, Mid-Holocene paleoenvironments and the archaeological record of southern Mendoza, Argentina, Quaternary International, 132, 81, 10.1016/j.quaint.2004.07.014 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Gnecco, 1998, Intercambio y comercio entre costa, Andes y selva, 49
  26. Hidalgo, 2000, Culturas de Chile: prehistoria (desde sus orígenes hasta los albores de la conquista)
  27. Kaltwasser, 1983, Estudio de once fechas de R. C. 14 relacionadas con el hombre de Cuchipuy, Boletín de Prehistoria de Chile, 9, 9
  28. Lagiglia, 1968, Secuencias culturales del centro oeste Argentino: valles del Atuel y Diamante, Revista Científica de Investigaciones, 1, 159
  29. Lagiglia, 1997, Arqueología de cazadores-recolectores cordilleranos de altura
  30. Lagiglia, 2002, Entre montañas y desiertos: arqueología del sur de Mendoza, 43
  31. Laguens, 2007, Más allá del horizonte: cazadores-recolectores e intercambio a larga distancia en Intihuasi, Intersecciones en Antropología, 8, 7
  32. Neme, 2002, Entre montañas y desiertos: arqueología del sur de Mendoza, 65
  33. Neme, 2007, Cazadores recolectores de altura en los Andes meridionales, 10.30861/9781407300078 · DOI
  34. Neme, 2005, Actas del XVI Congreso Nacional de Arqueología Chilena, 317
  35. Neme, 2008, Biogeografía humana en los Andes meridionales: tendencias arqueológicas en el sur de Mendoza, Chungará, Revista de Antropología Chilena, 40, 5
  36. Roig, 1972, Bosquejo fisionómico de la vegetación de la provincia de Mendoza, Boletín de la Sociedad Argentina de Botánica, 13, 49
  37. Roig, 2000, Vegetación de la provincia de Mendoza, Argentina. Recursos y problemas ambientales de la zona árida. Primera parte. Provincias de Mendoza, San Juan y La Rioja, 63
  38. Salazar, 1992, Arqueología en América Latina Hoy, 116
  39. Sanhueza, 2000, Las comunidades alfareras iniciales en Chile central, Revista Chilena de Antropología, 15, 29
  40. Schobinger, 1976, El enterratorio Uspallata Usina Sur (Provincia de Mendoza). Estudio de su ajuar funerario, Anales de Arqueología y Etnología, 29-30, 67
  41. Seelenfreund, 1996, Trace element analysis of obsidian sources and artifacts of central Chile (Maule River basin) and western Argentina (Colorado river), Latin American Antiquity, 7, 7, 10.2307/3537011 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Shackley, 2009, The Topaz Basin archaeological obsidian source in the transition zone of central Arizona, Geoarchaeology, 24, 336, 10.1002/gea.20266 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Simkin, 1994, Volcanoes of the world: a regional directory, gazetteer, and chronology of volcanism during the last 10,000 years
  44. Stern, 2000, Características químicas, fuentes potenciales y distribución de diferentes tipos de obsidianas en el norte de la provincia del Chubut, Patagonia Argentina, Anales del Instituto de la Patagonia, 28, 275
  45. Veth, 1991, The evolution of the upper water layer in the marginal ice zone, austral spring 1988, Scotia-Weddell Sea, Journal of Marine Systems, 2, 451, 10.1016/0924-7963(91)90046-W · DOI
  46. Yacobaccio, 2002, Geochemical evidence for long-distance exchange, 167, 10.5040/9798216187578.ch-009 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
GIESSO, M., DURÁN, V., NEME, G., GLASCOCK, M. D., CORTEGOSO, V., GIL, A., & SANHUEZA, L.
Venue
Archaeometry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-12-16
Volume
53
Issue
1
Pages
1-21
ISSN
0003-813X
Cited by
47
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review