The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Affect and biopower: towards a politics of life
Open accessAbstract
In this paper I stage an encounter between two concepts that have become popular placeholders for a broad concern with a politics of life: affect and biopower. Through engagement with Antonio Negri’s writings on the ‘real subsumption of life’ in contemporary capitalism and Michel Foucault’s lectures on neoliberalism, I show that understanding how forms of biopower work through affect requires attending to three relations: affective relations and capacities are object‐targets for discipline, biopolitics, security and environmentality; affective life is the outside through which new ways of living may emerge; and specific collective affects (including ‘state‐phobia’) are part of the conditions for the birth of forms of biopower. In what is simultaneously a departure from, and an affirmation of, recent work on affect, I argue that attending to the dynamics of affective life may become political as a counter to forms of biopower that work through processes of normalisation. The consequence is that understanding how biopower works on and through affect becomes a precondition for developing affirmative relations with affective life.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1980) · Cited by 22,286
Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life
Agamben, G. (2020) · Stanford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780804764025 · Cited by 7,078
The History of Sexuality: An Introduction
Foucault, M. (2012) · Cited by 5,375
Zelnick, S., & Williams, R. (1978) · The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism · doi:10.2307/429853 · Cited by 4,734
Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times
Puar, J. K. (2007) · doi:10.1215/9780822390442 · Cited by 3,128
Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (2005) · International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society · doi:10.1007/s10767-006-9006-9 · Cited by 2,557
Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity
Sedgwick, E. K. (2003) · doi:10.1215/9780822384786 · Cited by 2,464
(2008) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9780230594180 · Cited by 1,926
Intensities of feeling: towards a spatial politics of affect
Thrift, N. (2004) · Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography · doi:10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00154.x · Cited by 1,919
Constructions of Neoliberal Reason
Peck, J. (2010) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199580576.001.0001 · Cited by 1,914
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, B.
- Venue
- Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-04-12
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 28-43
- ISSN
- 0020-2754 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-5661
- OpenAlex
- W1893160352
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 57
- FWCI
- 76.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Affect and biopower: towards a politics of life. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2011.00441.x
- The paper
- Anderson, B. (2012). Affect and biopower: towards a politics of life. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2011.00441.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.