The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exchanging access goods for access: A comparative study of business lobbying in the European Union institutions
Abstract
The aim of this article is to test empirically a theory of access that investigates the logic behind the apparent ad hoc lobbying behavior of business interests in the European Union (EU) multi‐level system. First, a theoretical framework is set out that attempts to explain the access of different organizational forms of business interest representation – companies, associations and consultants – to the European Commission, the European Parliament and the Council of Ministers. The degree of access to these institutions is explained in terms of a theory of the supply and demand of access goods. Access goods concern information that is crucial in the EU policy‐making process. In return for access to an EU institution, business interests have to provide the access good(s) demanded by that institution. A number of specific hypotheses about access are analyzed in an extensive empirical study of the EU financial services sector. On the basis of 126 exploratory and semi‐structured interviews, the hypotheses are checked across the three EU institutions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences
Guitton, H., & Siegel, S. (1958) · Revue économique · doi:10.2307/3498751 · Cited by 35,245
Exchange and Power in Social Life
Blau, P. M. (2017) · doi:10.4324/9780203792643 · Cited by 15,923
Olson, M. (1965) · doi:10.4159/9780674041660 · Cited by 14,191
External Control of Organizations: Resource Dependence Perspective
(2011) · Organizational Behavior 6 · doi:10.4324/9781315701967-54 · Cited by 14,181
Exchange and Power in Social Life.
Bierstedt, R., & Blau, P. M. (1965) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091154 · Cited by 13,624
The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups.
Sufrin, S. C., & Olson, M. (1966) · Industrial and Labor Relations Review · doi:10.2307/2521228 · Cited by 11,518
The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective
Reitz, H. J., Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1979) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257794 · Cited by 9,172
Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences
McGinn, L. C. (1957) · Journal of the Franklin Institute · doi:10.1016/0016-0032(57)90766-4 · Cited by 7,204
The rise of the regulatory state in Europe
Majone, G. (1994) · West European Politics · doi:10.1080/01402389408425031 · Cited by 1,833
The Governmental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion
Hardin, C. M., & Truman, D. B. (1951) · The Western Political Quarterly · doi:10.2307/443170 · Cited by 1,241
Cited by
Learning from Practical Experience: Implementation Epistemic Communities in the European Union
Polman, D. (2018) · International Series on Public Policy · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-76210-4_6 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Bouwen, P.
- Venue
- European Journal of Political Research
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2004-05
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 337-369
- ISSN
- 0304-4130 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-6765
- OpenAlex
- W2164996038
- Cited by
- 432
- References
- 38
- FWCI
- 19.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exchanging access goods for access: A comparative study of business lobbying in the European Union institutions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2004.00157.x
- The paper
- Bouwen, P. (2004). Exchanging access goods for access: A comparative study of business lobbying in the European Union institutions. European Journal of Political Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2004.00157.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.