The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Growth in women's political representation: A longitudinal exploration of democracy, electoral system and gender quotas
Abstract
The expansion of women's formal political representation ranks among the most significant trends in international politics of the last 100 years. Though women made steady political progress, substantial country‐level variation exists in patterns of growth and change. In this article, longitudinal theories are developed to examine how political factors affect women's political representation over time. Latent growth curve models are used to assess the growth of women in politics in 110 countries from 1975 to 2000. The article investigates how electoral systems, national‐level gender quotas and growth of democracy – both political rights and civil liberties – impact country‐level trajectories of women's legislative representation. It is found: first, national quotas do affect women's political presence, but at a lower level than legislated by law; second, the impact of a proportional representation system on women's political representation is steady over time; and third, democracy, especially civil liberties, does not affect the level of women's political representation in the earliest period, but does influence the growth of women's political representation over time. These findings both reinforce and challenge prior cross‐sectional models of women's political representation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics
Pierson, P. (2000) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2586011 · Cited by 8,094 · cited 4×
“The process is one of increasing returns over time, where women’s early presence creates momentum for further gains in the political sphere (Pierson 2000).”
BackgroundInfluentialAllison, P. (2002) · doi:10.4135/9781412985079 · Cited by 2,050
Political Institutions under Dictatorship
Gandhi, J. (2008) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511510090 · Cited by 1,910
Chen, F., Curran, P. J., Bollen, K. A., Kirby, J., & Paxton, P. (2008) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124108314720 · Cited by 1,538
Self-citation
Cited by
Women’s Political Empowerment: A New Global Index, 1900–2012
Sundström, A., Paxton, P., Wang, Y.-T., & Lindberg, S. I. (2017) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.01.016 · Cited by 292
Self-citationIntersectionality, Quotas, and Minority Women's Political Representation Worldwide
HUGHES, M. M. (2011) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055411000293 · Cited by 286
Self-citationCivil War and Trajectories of Change in Women's Political Representation in Africa, 1985–2010
Hughes, M. M., & Tripp, A. M. (2015) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/sov003 · Cited by 197
Self-citationCan Deliberative Participatory Fora Cure Representation Gaps in France and Germany?
Blome, A., & Hartlapp, M. (2023) · Politische Vierteljahresschrift · doi:10.1007/s11615-022-00452-0 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Paxton, P., Hughes, M. M., & Painter, M. A.
- Venue
- European Journal of Political Research
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-52
- ISSN
- 0304-4130 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-6765
- OpenAlex
- W2144772291
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 19.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Growth in women's political representation: A longitudinal exploration of democracy, electoral system and gender quotas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01886.x
- The paper
- Paxton, P., Hughes, M. M., & Painter, M. A. (2010). Growth in women's political representation: A longitudinal exploration of democracy, electoral system and gender quotas. European Journal of Political Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01886.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.