Cited by 31Smoking Behavior and CessationPrimary Care and Health OutcomesHealth Policy Implementation Science

Multilevel Analysis of the Chronic Care Model and 5A Services for Treating Tobacco Use in Urban Primary Care Clinics

Open access
Hung, Dorothy Y., Shelley, Donna R.·2009·Health Services Research

Abstract

Objective. To examine the chronic care model (CCM) as a framework for improving provider delivery of 5A tobacco cessation services. Methods. Cross‐sectional surveys were used to obtain data from 497 health care providers in 60 primary care clinics serving low‐income patients in New York City. A hierarchical generalized linear modeling approach to ordinal regression was used to estimate the probability of full 5A service delivery, adjusting for provider covariates and clustering effects. We examined associations between provider delivery of 5A services, clinic implementation of CCM elements tailored for treating tobacco use, and the degree of CCM integration in clinics. Principal Findings. Providers practicing in clinics with enhanced delivery system design, clinical information systems, and self‐management support for cessation were 2.04–5.62 times more likely to perform all 5A services ( p<.05). CCM integration in clinics was also positively associated with 5As delivery. Compared with none, implementation of one to six CCM elements corresponded with a 3.69–30.9 increased odds of providers delivering the full spectrum of 5As ( p<.01). Conclusions. Findings suggest that the CCM facilitates provider adherence to the Public Health Service 5A clinical guideline. Achieving the full benefits of systems change may require synergistic adoption of all model components.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00896.x

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Translation research is relatively uncommon.

    “Despite its importance, such translation research is relatively rare (6–8), perhaps because using current approaches translation can be arduous and slow, sometimes taking 15 to 20 years (9, 10).”
  • There are viable models ranging from clinic staff merely referring to a state quitline or an eHealth intervention, to a chronic care model approach to disease management.

    “The possibilities are legion with viable models ranging from clinic staff merely referring to a state quitline or an eHealth intervention (54, 55), to a chronic care model approach to disease management in which staff take primary responsibility for assessment, intervening, and patient tracking (7).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Hopkins, D., P. Briss, C. Ricard, C. Husten, V. Carande-Kulis, J. Fielding, M. Alao, J. McKenna, D. Sharp, J. Harris, T. Woollery, and K. Harris. 2001. ''Reviews of Evidence Regarding Interventions to Reduce Tobacco Use and Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke.'' American Journal of Preventive Medicine 20 (suppl 2): 16-66.
  2. ------. 2003. Priority Areas for National Action: Transforming Health Care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  3. Snijders, T., and R. Bosker. 1999. Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hung, D. Y., & Shelley, D. R.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Hung, Dorothy Y.
Venue
Health Services Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-01-15
Volume
44
Issue
1
Pages
103-127
ISSN
  • 0017-9124 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-6773
OpenAlex
W2028266527
Cited by
31
References
51
Citations by year
2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Services Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • New York State Department of Health
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (K02HS017007, K02-HS017007-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
Chronic Care Model, tobacco dependence treatment, primary health centers, urban primary care, low-income patients, delivery system design, clinical information systems, self-management support, multilevel analysis
MeSH terms
Adult, Chronic Disease, Cross-Sectional Studies, Decision Support Techniques, Female, Health Services Research, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, New York City, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Primary Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Tobacco Use Disorder, Urban Population, Models, Organizational, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Total Quality Management, Tobacco Use Cessation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review