The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Elucidating the Role of Place in Health Care Disparities: The Example of Racial/Ethnic Residential Segregation
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To develop a conceptual framework for investigating the role of racial/ethnic residential segregation on health care disparities. Data Sources and Settings: Review of the MEDLINE and the Web of Science databases for articles published from 1998 to 2011. Study Design: The extant research was evaluated to describe mechanisms that shape health care access, utilization, and quality of preventive, diagnostic, therapeutic, and end‐of‐life services across the life course. Principal Findings: The framework describes the influence of racial/ethnic segregation operating through neighborhood‐, health care system‐, provider‐, and individual‐level factors. Conceptual and methodological issues arising from limitations of the research and complex relationships between various levels were identified. Conclusions: Increasing evidence indicates that racial/ethnic residential segregation is a key factor driving place‐based health care inequalities. Closer attention to address research gaps has implications for advancing and strengthening the literature to better inform effective interventions and policy‐based solutions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care
(2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-5843 · Cited by 7,043
The Effect of Race and Sex on Physicians' Recommendations for Cardiac Catheterization
Schulman, K. A., Berlin, J. A., Harless, W., Kerner, J. F., Sistrunk, S., Gersh, B. J., Dubé, R., Taleghani, C. K., Burke, J. E., Williams, S., et al. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199902253400806 · Cited by 1,934
LaVeist, T. A., Nickerson, K. J., & Bowie, J. V. (2000) · Medical Care Research and Review · doi:10.1177/1077558700057001s07 · Cited by 918
Cited by
Structural racism and health inequities in the USA: evidence and interventions
Bailey, Z. D., Krieger, N., Agénor, M., Graves, J., Linos, N., & Bassett, M. T. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30569-x · Cited by 5,203
Racism and health: evidence and needed research
Williams, D. R., Lawrence, J. A., & Davis, B. A. (2019) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040218-043750 · Cited by 2,398
Self-citationRacism and Health I: Pathways and Scientific Evidence
Williams, D. R., & Mohammed, S. A. (2013) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764213487340 · Cited by 1,336
Self-citationDiscrimination and Health Inequities
Krieger, N. (2014) · International Journal of Health Services · doi:10.2190/hs.44.4.b · Cited by 953
African American Experiences in Healthcare: I Always Feel like I’m Getting Skipped Over
Cuevas, A. G., O'Brien, K., & Saha, S. (2016) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/hea0000368 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- White, K., Haas, J. S., & Williams, D. R.
- Venue
- Health Services Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-04-19
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 3pt2
- Pages
- 1278-1299
- ISSN
- 0017-9124 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-6773
- OpenAlex
- W2037692959
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 17.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
