The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In vivo properties of SB 200646A, a 5‐HT2C/2Breceptor antagonist
Open accessAbstract
1. SB 200646A, N-(1-methyl-5-indolyl)-N'-(3-pyridyl) urea hydrochloride, the first reported selective 5-HT2C/2B over 5-HT2A receptor antagonist, (pK1 rat 5-HT2C receptor 6.9, pA2 rat 5-HT2B receptor 7.5, pK1 rat 5-HT2A receptor 5.2) dose-dependently blocked a putative rat model of 5-HT2C receptor activation; 1-(3-chlorophenyl)piperazine (mCPP, 5 mg kg-1, i.p. 20 min pretest)-induced hypolocomotion (estimated ID50 19.2 mg kg-1, p.o.). 2. SB 200646A also blocked another putative in vivo model of 5-HT2C receptor function; mCPP (5 mg kg-1, i.p. 20 min pretest)-induced hypophagia in 23 h food-deprived rats (estimated ID50 18.3 mg kg-1, p.o.). 3. SB 200646A did not antagonize 1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl)-2-aminopropane (DOI)-induced head shakes in rats at doses up to 200 mg kg-1, p.o., an effect thought to be mediated by 5-HT2A receptors for which SB 200646A has its next highest affinity (50 fold less) after the 5-HT2C and 5-HT2B sites. 4. SB 200646A (20, 40 mg kg-1, p.o., 1 h pretest) also reversed mCPP (0.5 mg kg-1, i.p., 30 min pretest)-induced anxiety in the social interaction test, under low light familiar conditions. 5. When given alone, under high light unfamiliar conditions, SB 200646A (2-40 mg kg-1, p.o.) increased active social interaction without affecting locomotor activity in the rat social interaction test. This is consistent with an anxiolytic action of SB 200646A. 6. These results indicate that SB 200646A has in vivo efficacy and that 5-HT2C or 5-HT2B receptors are indeed likely to mediate mCPP-induced hypolocomotion, hypophagia and anxiogenesis. They also suggest that 5-HT2C,2B receptor blockade induces anxiolysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Animal Models for Predicting Clinical Efficacy of Anxiolytic Drugs: Social Behaviour
File, S. E. (2008) · Neuropsychobiology · doi:10.1159/000118163 · Cited by 141
Cited by
Nichols, D. E. (2004) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2003.11.002 · Cited by 1,211
The elevated T-maze as an experimental model of anxiety
Graeff, F. G., Ferreira Netto, C., & Zangrossi Jr, H. (1998) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(98)00024-4 · Cited by 391
Recent advances in the neuropsychopharmacology of serotonergic hallucinogens
Halberstadt, A. L. (2015) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2014.07.016 · Cited by 312
“Similarly, there is a consensus in the literature that the ability of DOI to induce the HTR is not blocked by selective 5-HT2C antagonists or mixed 5-HT2C/2B antagonists (Kennett et al., 1994; Schreiber et al., 1995; Wettstein et al., 1999; Vickers et al., 2001; Fantegrossi et al., 2010).”
BackgroundThe serotonergic system in Parkinson's disease
Huot, P., Fox, S. H., & Brotchie, J. M. (2011) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2011.08.004 · Cited by 195
Metadata
- Authors
- Kennett, G. A., Wood, M. D., Glen, A., Grewal, S., Forbes, I., Gadre, A., & Blackburn, T. P.
- Venue
- British Journal of Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-03
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 797-802
- ISSN
- 0007-1188 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5381
- OpenAlex
- W2025678690
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In vivo properties of SB 200646A, a 5‐HT2C/2Breceptor antagonist. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1476-5381.1994.tb14808.x
- The paper
- Kennett, G. A., Wood, M. D., Glen, A., Grewal, S., Forbes, I., Gadre, A., & Blackburn, T. P. (1994). In vivo properties of SB 200646A, a 5‐HT2C/2Breceptor antagonist. British Journal of Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.1994.tb14808.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.