The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Aminoguanidine attenuates the delayed circulatory failure and improves survival in rodent models of endotoxic shock
Open accessAbstract
We have investigated the effects of aminoguanidine, a relatively selective inhibitor of the cytokine‐ inducible isoform of nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), on the delayed circulatory failure, vascular hyporeactivity to vasoconstrictor agents, and iNOS activity in a rat model of circulatory shock induced by bacterial endotoxin (E. coli lipopolysaccharide; LPS). In addition, we have evaluated the effect of aminoguanidine on the 24 h survival rate in a murine model of endotoxaemia. Male Wistar rats were anaesthetized and instrumented for the measurement of mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR). Injection of LPS (10 mg kg−1, i.v.) resulted in a fall in MAP from 115 ± 4mmHg (time 0, control) to 79 ± 9mmHg at 180 min (P<0.05, n = 10). The pressor effect of noradrenaline (NA, 1 μg kg−1, i.v.) was also significantly reduced at 60, 120 and 180 min after LPS injection. In contrast, animals pretreated with aminoguanidine (15 mg kg _1, i.v., 20 min prior to LPS injection) maintained a significantly higher MAP (at 180 min, 102 ± 3mmHg, n= 10, P<0.05) when compared to rats given only LPS (LPS‐rats). Cumulative administration of aminoguanidine (15 mg kg−1 and 45mgkg−1) given 180 min after LPS caused a dose‐related increase in MAP and reversed the hypotension. Aminoguanidine also significantly alleviated the reduction of the pressor response to NA: indeed, at 180 min, the pressor response returned to normal in aminoguanidine pretreated LPS‐ rats. Thoracic aortae obtained from rats at 180 min after LPS showed a significant reduction in the contractile responses elicited by NA (10−9‐10−6 m). Pretreatment with aminoguanidine (15 mg kg−1, i.v., at 20 min prior to LPS) significantly prevented this LPS‐induced hyporeactivity to NA ex vivo. Endotoxaemia for 180 min resulted in a significant increase in iNOS activity in the lung from 0.6 ± 0.2 pmol mg−1 min−1 (control, n = 4) to 4.8 ± 0.3 pmol mg−1 min−1 (P<0.05, n = 6). In LPS‐rats treated with aminoguanidine, iNOS activity in the lung was attenuated by 44 ± 5% (n = 6, P<0.05). Moreover, when added in vitro to lung homogenates obtained from LPS‐rats, aminoguanidine and N ω‐nitro‐L‐arginine methyl ester (l‐NAME; 10−8 to 10−3 m) caused a concentration‐dependent inhibition of iNOS activity (n = 3–6, IC 50: 30 ± 12 and 11 ± 6μm, respectively P>0.05). In contrast, aminoguanidine was a less potent inhibitor than L‐NAME of the constitutive nitric oxide synthase in rat brain homogenates (n = 3–6, IC 50 is 140 ± 10 and 0.6 ± 0.1 μm, respectively, P<0.05). In addition, the inhibitory effect of aminoguanidine on iNOS activity showed a slower onset than that of L‐NAME (maximal inhibition at 90 min and 30 min, respectively). Treatment of conscious Swiss albino (T/O) mice with a high dose of endotoxin (60 mg kg−1, i.p.) resulted in a survival rate of only 8% at 24 h (n=12). However, therapeutic application of aminoguanidine (15 mg kg−1, i.p. at 2 h and 6 h after LPS) increased the 24 h survival rate to 75% (n = 8), whereas L‐NAME (3 mg kg−1, i.p. at 2h and 6h after LPS) did not affect the survival rate (11%, n = 9). Thus, aminoguanidine inhibits iNOS activity and attenuates the delayed circulatory failure caused by endotoxic shock in the rat and improves survival in a murine model of endotoxaemia. Aminoguanidine, or novel, more potent selective inhibitors of iNOS may be useful in the therapy of septic shock.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nitric oxide: physiology, pathophysiology, and pharmacology.
Moncada, S., Palmer, R. M., & Higgs, E. A. (1991) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0031-6997(25)06663-3 · Cited by 15,525
The L-Arginine-Nitric Oxide Pathway
Epstein, F. H., Moncada, S., & Higgs, A. (1993) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199312303292706 · Cited by 6,678
Cited by
Inducible nitric oxide synthase: Regulation, structure, and inhibition
Cinelli, M. A., Do, H. T., Miley, G. P., & Silverman, R. B. (2020) · Medicinal Research Reviews · doi:10.1002/med.21599 · Cited by 889
Nitric oxide: a key mediator in the early and late phase of carrageenan‐induced rat paw inflammation
Salvemini, D., Wang, Z., Wyatt, P. S., Bourdon, D. M., Marino, M. H., Manning, P. T., & Currie, M. G. (1996) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.1996.tb15475.x · Cited by 668
Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase and Inflammatory Diseases
Zamora, R., Vodovotz, Y., & Billiar, T. R. (2000) · Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1007/bf03401781 · Cited by 558
Bolli, R., Manchikalapudi, S., Tang, X.-L., Takano, H., Qiu, Y., Guo, Y., Zhang, Q., & Jadoon, A. K. (1997) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/01.res.81.6.1094 · Cited by 313
Is nitric oxide overproduction the target of choice for the management of septic shock?
Feihl, F., Waeber, B., & Liaudet, L. (2001) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/s0163-7258(01)00155-3 · Cited by 151
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, C., Chen, S., Szabó, C., Thiemermann, C., & Vane, J. R.
- Venue
- British Journal of Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-04
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1666-1672
- ISSN
- 0007-1188 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5381
- OpenAlex
- W2002069556
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 23.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aminoguanidine attenuates the delayed circulatory failure and improves survival in rodent models of endotoxic shock. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1476-5381.1995.tb14955.x
- The paper
- Wu, C., Chen, S., Szabó, C., Thiemermann, C., & Vane, J. R. (1995). Aminoguanidine attenuates the delayed circulatory failure and improves survival in rodent models of endotoxic shock. British Journal of Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.1995.tb14955.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.