Cited by 36Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsAppendicitis Diagnosis and Management

Is incidental appendectomy necessary in women with ovarian endometrioma?

WIE, He Jong, LEE, Jung Hun, KYUNG, Min Sun, JUNG, Un Suk, CHOI, Joong Sub·2008·Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several studies reported that pathology of the appendix is frequently detected alongside endometriosis, especially with chronic pelvic pain. Furthermore, ovarian endometriosis is a marker of more extensive pelvic and intestinal disease. AIMS: To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of incidental appendectomy in laparoscopic surgical treatment for ovarian endometrioma. METHODS: One hundred and six women with ovarian endometrioma underwent laparoscopic surgery including laparoscopic appendectomy. Clinicopathological data were collected and analysed. RESULTS: The main symptoms consisted of lower abdominal pain in 51 (48.1%) women, dysmenorrhoea in 23 (21.7%), left lower quadrant pain in 6 (5.7%), right lower quadrant pain in nine (8.5%), chronic pelvic pain in five (4.7%), and others in 12 (11.3%). Only three (3.3%) of the 106 women had abnormal findings on gross inspection during laparoscopic surgery: two women with endometriotic spots on the surface of their appendixes, and one with peri-appendiceal inflammation with severe adhesions. Of the 106 resected appendixes, 37 (34.9%) had histopathologically confirmed pathology including lymphoid hyperplasia in 12 (11.3%), endometriosis in 14 (13.2%), peri-appendicitis and serositis in five (4.7%), carcinoid tumour in three (2.8%), and others in three (2.8%). CONCLUSIONS: In all surgical treatments for ovarian endometrioma, surgeons need to preoperatively inform the patients of the fact that appendiceal pathology including endometriosis is found frequently regardless of concurrent symptoms or gross finding of the appendix. Furthermore, surgeons should take into account the possibility of appendiceal pathology during operation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1479-828x.2007.00811.x

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Intraoperative evaluation alone is a weak method to assuredly evaluate the state of the appendix, and visual inspection of a normal-appearing appendix may miss intraluminal pathology.

    “Due to the diverse morphology of appendices, intraoperative evaluation alone is a weak method to assuredly evaluate and assess the state of the appendix, and visual inspection of a normal appearing appendix may miss intraluminal pathology [32].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
WIE, H. J., LEE, J. H., KYUNG, M. S., JUNG, U. S., & CHOI, J. S.
Affiliations
Kangbuk Samsung Hospital (KR)
Corresponding author
CHOI, Joong Sub
Venue
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-02
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
107-111
ISSN
  • 0004-8666 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-828X
OpenAlex
W2087734642
Cited by
36
References
23
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
endometrioma, incidental appendectomy, appendiceal pathology, appendiceal endometriosis, laparoscopic surgery, chronic pelvic pain, carcinoid tumor, lymphoid hyperplasia, serositis, preoperative information
MeSH terms
Adult, Appendectomy, Appendicitis, Appendix, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Ovarian Diseases, Laparoscopy, Retrospective Studies, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, Comorbidity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review