Cited by 179Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsDiagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis

Extragenital endometriosis--a clinicopathological review of a Glasgow hospital experience with case illustrations

Douglas, C, Rotimi, O·2004·Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Abstract

The clinicopathological characteristics of 34 cases of extragenital endometriosis (mean age 33.74) presenting to surgeons over a 9-year period at Glasgow Royal Infirmary were reviewed. A total of 379 cases of endometriosis were diagnosed by histology during the period, giving an 8.9% prevalence of extragenital manifestations. Eleven (32.3%) cases were in the intestinal tract, two (5.9%) in the urinary tract and 21 (61.8%) were in other sites, including pfannenstial scar, inguinal canal, umbilicus and perineum; 52.9% presented to gynaecologists and mean time to diagnosis was 24.54 months (CI: 13.2 - 35.8). Pain was the most common presentation in 76.5% but this was cyclical, reported in only 41.2%. Palpable mass was found in 41.2%, especially in pfannenstial scar (26.5%), suggesting iatrogenic cause. Histology remains the cornerstone of diagnosis and several of the case histories describe delay and diagnostic confusion. Endometriosis is rarely fatal, but continues to challenge patients and clinicians in all specialities in presentation and diagnosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01443610400009568

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Douglas, C., & Rotimi, O.
Affiliations
  • Inverclyde Royal Hospital (GB)
  • Leeds General Infirmary (GB)
Venue
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Published
2004-01
Volume
24
Issue
7
Pages
804-808
ISSN
  • 0144-3615 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-6893
OpenAlex
W2158642216
Cited by
179
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 11
FWCI
8.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis
Keywords
extragenital endometriosis, intestinal endometriosis, urinary tract endometriosis, pelvic endometriosis, delayed diagnosis, cyclical pain, palpable mass, iatrogenic endometriosis, histopathological diagnosis, clinicopathological features
MeSH terms
Adult, Appendix, Urinary Bladder Diseases, Uterine Cervical Diseases, Cicatrix, Diagnosis, Differential, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Intestinal Diseases, Middle Aged, Omentum, Pain, Perineum, Peritoneal Diseases, Umbilicus, Urologic Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review