The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rethinking Community‐Based Conservation
Open accessAbstract
Abstract: Community‐based conservation (CBC) is based on the idea that if conservation and development could be simultaneously achieved, then the interests of both could be served. It has been controversial because community development objectives are not necessarily consistent with conservation objectives in a given case. I examined CBC from two angles. First, CBC can be seen in the context of paradigm shifts in ecology and applied ecology. I identified three conceptual shifts—toward a systems view, toward the inclusion of humans in the ecosystem, and toward participatory approaches to ecosystem management—that are interrelated and pertain to an understanding of ecosystems as complex adaptive systems in which humans are an integral part. Second, I investigated the feasibility of CBC, as informed by a number of emerging interdisciplinary fields that have been pursuing various aspects of coupled systems of humans and nature. These fields—common property, traditional ecological knowledge, environmental ethics, political ecology, and environmental history—provide insights for CBC. They may contribute to the development of an interdisciplinary conservation science with a more sophisticated understanding of social‐ecological interactions. The lessons from these fields include the importance of cross‐scale conservation, adaptive comanagement, the question of incentives and multiple stakeholders, the use of traditional ecological knowledge, and development of a cross‐cultural conservation ethic.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action
Ostrom, E. (1990) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511807763 · Cited by 20,653
Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action
Field, B. C., & Ostrom, E. (1992) · Land Economics · doi:10.2307/3146384 · Cited by 18,859
REDISCOVERY OF TRADITIONAL ECOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE AS ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT
Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2000) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1251:roteka]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 4,206
Self-citationUnderstanding the complexity of economic, ecological and social systems
Holling, C. S. (2001) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5 · Cited by 4,087
(2002) · Cited by 3,806
(1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.36-0288 · Cited by 3,703
The Perception of the Environment
Ingold, T. (2002) · doi:10.4324/9780203466025 · Cited by 3,356
The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill
Ingold, T. (2021) · Cited by 3,241
Resilience and Sustainable Development: Building Adaptive Capacity in a World of Transformations
Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L., Holling, C. S., & Walker, B. (2002) · AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment · doi:10.1579/0044-7447-31.5.437 · Cited by 3,136
Enchantment and Disenchantment: The Role of Community in Natural Resource Conservation
Agrawal, A., & Gibson, C. C. (1999) · World Development · doi:10.1016/s0305-750x(98)00161-2 · Cited by 2,908
Cited by
O.Nyumba, T., Wilson, K., Derrick, C. J., & Mukherjee, N. (2018) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12860 · Cited by 2,619
“The link between people’s perceptions and their socio- cultural situation is critical to decision- making on natural resources since most people derive their notions, mental constructions and interpretations from their immediate surrounding and develop these from experiential knowledge (Berkes, 2004).”
BackgroundScaling up from gardens: biodiversity conservation in urban environments.
Goddard, M. A., Dougill, A. J., & Benton, T. G. (2010) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.07.016 · Cited by 1,595
Biodiversity Conservation and the Eradication of Poverty
Adams, W. M., Aveling, R., Brockington, D., Dickson, B., Elliott, J., Hutton, J., Roe, D., Vira, B., & Wolmer, W. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1097920 · Cited by 1,364
Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management
Raymond, C. M., Fazey, I., Reed, M. S., Stringer, L. C., Robinson, G. M., & Evely, A. C. (2010) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.03.023 · Cited by 1,116
The Efficiency of Payments for Environmental Services in Tropical Conservation
WUNDER, S. (2007) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00559.x · Cited by 958
Metadata
- Authors
- BERKES, F.
- Venue
- Conservation Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-05-10
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 621-630
- ISSN
- 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-1739
- OpenAlex
- W2101873753
- Cited by
- 1,884
- References
- 50
- FWCI
- 53.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rethinking Community‐Based Conservation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00077.x
- The paper
- BERKES, F. (2004). Rethinking Community‐Based Conservation. Conservation Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00077.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.