The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social Capital in Biodiversity Conservation and Management
Abstract
Abstract: The knowledge and values of local communities are now being acknowledged as valuable for biodiversity conservation. Relationships of trust, reciprocity and exchange, common rules, norms and sanctions, and connectedness in groups are what make up social capital, which is a necessary resource for shaping individual action to achieve positive biodiversity outcomes. Agricultural and rural conservation programs address biodiversity at three levels: agrobiodiversity on farms, nearby nature in landscapes, and protected areas. Recent initiatives that have sought to build social capital have shown that rural people can improve their understanding of biodiversity and agroecological relationships at the same time as they develop new social rules, norms, and institutions. This process of social learning helps new ideas to spread and can lead to positive biodiversity outcomes over large areas. New ideas spread more rapidly where there is high social capital. There remain many practical and policy difficulties, however, not least regarding the need to invest in social capital formation and the many unresolved questions of how the state views communities empowered to make their own decisions. Nonetheless, attention to the value of social relations, in the form of trust, reciprocal arrangements, locally developed rules, norms and sanctions, and emergent institutions, has clearly been shown to deliver a biodiversity dividend in many contexts. This suggests a need to blend both the biological and social elements of conservation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital
Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/387253a0 · Cited by 22,585
Putnam, R. (2000) · doi:10.1145/358916.361990 · Cited by 17,114
Olson, M. (1965) · doi:10.4159/9780674041660 · Cited by 14,191
Social Capital and the Environment
Pretty, J., & Ward, H. (2001) · World Development · doi:10.1016/s0305-750x(00)00098-x · Cited by 1,764
Self-citationParticipatory learning for sustainable agriculture
Pretty, J. N. (1995) · World Development · doi:10.1016/0305-750x(95)00046-f · Cited by 1,753
Self-citationCents and Sociability: Household Income and Social Capital in Rural Tanzania
Narayan, D., & Pritchett, L. (1999) · Economic Development and Cultural Change · doi:10.1086/452436 · Cited by 1,115
Kaus (1992) · doi:10.2307/1311675 · Cited by 350
Cited by
Ifejika Speranza, C., Wiesmann, U., & Rist, S. (2014) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.005 · Cited by 573
Utilizing and conserving agrobiodiversity in agricultural landscapes
Jackson, L. E., Pascual, U., & Hodgkin, T. (2007) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2006.12.017 · Cited by 560
The Political Economy of Cross-Scale Networks in Resource Co-Management
Adger, W. N., Brown, K., & Tompkins, E. L. (2005) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-01465-100209 · Cited by 524
Andrade, G. S. M., & Rhodes, J. R. (2012) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-05216-170414 · Cited by 516
Employing Philosophical Dialogue in Collaborative Science
Eigenbrode, S. D., O'rourke, M., Wulfhorst, J. D., Althoff, D. M., Goldberg, C. S., Merrill, K., Morse, W., Nielsen-Pincus, M., Stephens, J., Winowiecki, L., et al. (2007) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/b570109 · Cited by 411
Metadata
- Authors
- PRETTY, J., & SMITH, D.
- Venue
- Conservation Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-05-10
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 631-638
- ISSN
- 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-1739
- OpenAlex
- W2053121175
- Cited by
- 750
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 16.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social Capital in Biodiversity Conservation and Management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00126.x
- The paper
- PRETTY, J., & SMITH, D. (2004). Social Capital in Biodiversity Conservation and Management. Conservation Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00126.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.