Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 402

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Modern Insect Extinctions, the Neglected Majority

DUNN, ROBERT R.·2005·Conservation Biology

Abstract

Abstract: Most extinctions estimated to have occurred in the historical past, or predicted to occur in the future, are of insects. Despite this, the study of insect extinctions has been neglected. Only 70 modern insect extinctions have been documented, although thousands are estimated to have occurred. By focusing on some of the 70 documented extinctions as case studies, I considered ways in which insect extinctions may differ from those of other taxa. These case studies suggested that two types of extinction might be common for insects but rare for other taxa: extinction of narrow habitat specialists and coextinctions of affiliates with the extinctions of their hosts. Importantly, both of these forms of extinction are often ignored by conservation programs focused on vertebrates and plants. Anecdotal evidence and recent simulations suggest that many insect extinctions may have already occurred because of loss of narrow habitat specialists from restricted habitats and the loss of hosts. If we are serious about insect conservation, we need to spend more time and money documenting such extinctions. To neglect such extinctions is to ignore the majority of species that are or were in need of conservation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00078.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. 10.1007/s00442-003-1244-1 · DOI
  2. 10.2307/6025 · DOI
  3. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2000.99193.x · DOI
  4. 10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00076-4 · DOI
  5. 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00253.x · DOI
  6. Dunn R. R., 2002, On parasites lost, Wild Earth Spring, 12, 13
  7. 10.1007/BF00695913 · DOI
  8. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2004.00880.x · DOI
  9. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.1998.97196.x · DOI
  10. 10.1126/science.1060788 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1146/annurev.en.36.010191.002413 · DOI
  12. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1993.740845.x · DOI · Paper page
  13. Koh L. P., 2004, Co‐extinctions of tropical butterflies and their hostplants, Biotropica, 36, 272
  14. 10.1126/science.1101101 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1999.tb01945.x · DOI
  16. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.00021.x · DOI
  17. Liebherr J. K., 1997, Comparisons to the century before: the legacy of R. C. L. Perkins and Fauna Hawaiiensis as the basis for a long‐term ecological monitoring program, Pacific Science, 490
  18. 10.4039/Ent1211103-12 · DOI
  19. 10.1093/ee/19.5.1194 · DOI
  20. 10.1038/20436 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1007/s002679910035 · DOI
  22. Mawdsley N. A., 1995, Insects in a changing environment, 321
  23. McCafferty W. P., 2001, Status of some historically unfamiliar American mayflies (Ephemeroptera), Pan-Pacific Entomologist, 77, 210
  24. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.97393.x · DOI
  25. Opler P. A., 1978, The American chestnut symposium, 83
  26. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.06030376.x · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1023/A:1016688529572 · DOI
  28. 10.1038/35002708 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Powell J. A., 1978, Endangered habitats for insects: California coastal sand dunes, Atala, 6, 41
  30. 10.1645/0022-3395(2000)086[0948:PLDUTO]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  31. 10.1023/A:1023625710011 · DOI
  32. Redak R. A., 2000, Arthropods and multispecies habitat conservation plans: are we missing something, Environmental Management, 265, 97, 10.1007/s002670010065 · DOI
  33. Rentz D. C. F., 1977, A new and apparently extinct katydid from Antioch sand dunes, Entomological News, 88, 241
  34. Seal U. S., 1993, Conservation assessment and management plans (CAMPs) and global action plans (GAPs), Captive Breeding Specialists Group Newsletter, 4, 5
  35. Seow‐Choen F., 1997, Stick and leaf insect (Phasmida: Insecta) biodiversity in the nature reserves of Singapore. Proceedings of the Nature Reserves Survey Seminar, Gardens' Bulletin Singapore, 49, 297
  36. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10020338.x · DOI · Paper page
  37. Stork N. E., 1997, Biodiversity II, 41
  38. 10.1038/366307a0 · DOI
  39. 10.1038/nature02121 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.09010001.x · DOI
  41. 10.1071/IT01032 · DOI

Cited by

See all 402

Metadata

Authors
DUNN, R. R.
Venue
Conservation Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-06-30
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
1030-1036
ISSN
  • 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-1739
OpenAlex
W1559000103
Cited by
402
References
0
FWCI
10.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modern Insect Extinctions, the Neglected Majority. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00078.x
The paper
DUNN, R. R. (2005). Modern Insect Extinctions, the Neglected Majority. Conservation Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00078.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.