Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 522

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Local Participation in Natural Resource Monitoring: a Characterization of Approaches

DANIELSEN, FINN, BURGESS, NEIL D., BALMFORD, ANDREW, DONALD, PAUL F., FUNDER, MIKKEL, JONES, JULIA P. G., ALVIOLA, PHILIP, BALETE, DANILO S., BLOMLEY, TOM, BRASHARES, JUSTIN, CHILD, BRIAN, ENGHOFF, MARTIN, FJELDSÅ, JON, HOLT, SUNE, HÜBERTZ, HANNE, JENSEN, ARNE E., JENSEN, PER M., MASSAO, JOHN, MENDOZA, MARLYNN M., NGAGA, YONIKA, POULSEN, MICHAEL K., RUEDA, RICARDO, SAM, MOSES, SKIELBOE, THOMAS, STUART‐HILL, GREG, TOPP‐JØRGENSEN, ELMER, YONTEN, DEKI·2009·Conservation Biology

Abstract

Abstract: The monitoring of trends in the status of species or habitats is routine in developed countries, where it is funded by the state or large nongovernmental organizations and often involves large numbers of skilled amateur volunteers. Far less monitoring of natural resources takes place in developing countries, where state agencies have small budgets, there are fewer skilled professionals or amateurs, and socioeconomic conditions prevent development of a culture of volunteerism. The resulting lack of knowledge about trends in species and habitats presents a serious challenge for detecting, understanding, and reversing declines in natural resource values. International environmental agreements require signatories undertake systematic monitoring of their natural resources, but no system exists to guide the development and expansion of monitoring schemes. To help develop such a protocol, we suggest a typology of monitoring categories, defined by their degree of local participation, ranging from no local involvement with monitoring undertaken by professional researchers to an entirely local effort with monitoring undertaken by local people. We assessed the strengths and weaknesses of each monitoring category and the potential of each to be sustainable in developed or developing countries. Locally based monitoring is particularly relevant in developing countries, where it can lead to rapid decisions to solve the key threats affecting natural resources, can empower local communities to better manage their resources, and can refine sustainable‐use strategies to improve local livelihoods. Nevertheless, we recognize that the accuracy and precision of the monitoring undertaken by local communities in different situations needs further study and field protocols need to be further developed to get the best from the unrealized potential of this approach. A challenge to conservation biologists is to identify and establish the monitoring system most relevant to a particular situation and to develop methods to integrate outputs from across the spectrum of monitoring schemes to produce wider indices of natural resources that capture the strengths of each.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01063.x

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 38 references

Cited by

See all 522

Metadata

Authors
DANIELSEN, F., BURGESS, N. D., BALMFORD, A., DONALD, P. F., FUNDER, M., JONES, J. P. G., ALVIOLA, P., BALETE, D. S., BLOMLEY, T., BRASHARES, J., CHILD, B., ENGHOFF, M., FJELDSÅ, J., HOLT, S., HÜBERTZ, H., JENSEN, A. E., JENSEN, P. M., MASSAO, J., MENDOZA, M. M., NGAGA, Y., POULSEN, M. K., RUEDA, R., SAM, M., SKIELBOE, T., STUART‐HILL, G., TOPP‐JØRGENSEN, E., & YONTEN, D.
Venue
Conservation Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-01-14
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
31-42
ISSN
  • 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-1739
OpenAlex
W2059924891
Cited by
522
References
38
FWCI
21.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Local Participation in Natural Resource Monitoring: a Characterization of Approaches. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01063.x
The paper
DANIELSEN, F., BURGESS, N. D., BALMFORD, A., DONALD, P. F., FUNDER, M., JONES, J. P. G., ALVIOLA, P., BALETE, D. S., BLOMLEY, T., BRASHARES, J., CHILD, B., ENGHOFF, M., FJELDSÅ, J., HOLT, S., HÜBERTZ, H., JENSEN, A. E., JENSEN, P. M., MASSAO, J., MENDOZA, M. M., . . . YONTEN, D. (2009). Local Participation in Natural Resource Monitoring: a Characterization of Approaches. Conservation Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01063.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.