Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 224

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Skin Resurfacing with the Ultrapulse Carbon Dioxide Laser: Observations on 100 Patients

LOWE, NICHOLAS J., LASK, GARY, GRIFFIN, MOLLY E., MAXWELL, ANNE, LOWE, PHILIPPA, QUILADA, FLORIZZA·1995·Dermatologic Surgery

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Ultrapulse carbon dioxide (CO2) laser has been shown to be a highly effective treatment for photodamaged skin including improvement of rhytides, precancerous and benign skin lesions, as well as superficial benign pigmented lesions. OBJECTIVE: We describe our experiences using the Ultapulse CO2 laser in treating 100 patients with different severities of photodamaged skin. METHODS: All patients had moderately or severely photodamaged skin and were selected for treatment with the Ultrapulse CO2 laser to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of this treatment. The patients were placed on a pretreatment regimen for 2-6 weeks prior to receiving treatment with the Ultrapulse CO2 laser. Patients were evaluated for pre- and posttreatment severity of photodamage. In addition, skin surface replicas were obtained in selected patients and evaluated by computer image analysis technology. RESULTS: At 1 month post-laser treatment, 68 patients received a moderate improvement, five patients achieved a marked improvement, and the remaining 27 patients showed minimal improvement. By 2 months post-laser treatment, 20 of the 27 patients who at 1 month showed only minimal improvement revealed a moderate to marked improvement from baseline. All the patients studied developed a transient erythema that lasted up to 6 weeks, and many of these patients showed a transient hyperpigmentation that persisted for up to 4 months. CONCLUSION: The Ultrapulse CO2 laser is confirmed as an effective treatment for skin resurfacing of photodamaged skin.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1995.tb00552.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. David, 1985, Laser vermillion ablation for actinic cheilitis, J Dermatologic Surgery Oncol, 11, 605, 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1985.tb01904.x · doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.1985.tb01904.x
  2. David, 1989, CO2 laser abrasion for cosmetic and therapeutic treatment of facial actinic damage, Cutis, 43, 583
  3. Ratz, 1992, Treatment of facial acne scarring with the carbon dioxide laser, Am J Cosm Surg, 9, 181, 10.1177/074880689200900211 · doi:10.1177/074880689200900211
  4. Trost, 1992, Surgical Laser Properties and Their Tissue Interaction, 1131
  5. McKenzie, 1983, How far does thermal damage extend beneath the surface of CO2 laser incisions, Phys Med Biol, 28, 905, 10.1088/0031-9155/28/8/003 · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/28/8/003
  6. Hobbs, 1987, Superpulsed lasers: minimizing thermal damage with short duration, high irradiance pulses, J Dermatologic Surgery Oncol, 13, 955, 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1987.tb00571.x · doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.1987.tb00571.x
  7. Verschueren, 1980, Laser in Biology and Medicine
  8. Gernert, 1989, Time constants in thermal laser medicine, Lasers Surg Med, 9, 405, 10.1002/lsm.1900090414 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 224

Metadata

Authors
LOWE, N. J., LASK, G., GRIFFIN, M. E., MAXWELL, A., LOWE, P., & QUILADA, F.
Venue
Dermatologic Surgery
Published
1995-12
Volume
21
Issue
12
Pages
1025-1029
ISSN
1076-0512 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1526368547
Cited by
224
References
0
FWCI
26.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Skin Resurfacing with the Ultrapulse Carbon Dioxide Laser: Observations on 100 Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1524-4725.1995.tb00552.x
The paper
LOWE, N. J., LASK, G., GRIFFIN, M. E., MAXWELL, A., LOWE, P., & QUILADA, F. (1995). Skin Resurfacing with the Ultrapulse Carbon Dioxide Laser: Observations on 100 Patients. Dermatologic Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.1995.tb00552.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.