CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 33Reconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesNonmelanoma Skin Cancer StudiesHead and Neck Surgical Oncology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Staged cheek-to-nose and auricular interpolation flaps

Nguyen, Tri H.·2005·Dermatologic Surgery
DOI 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2005.31828
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Staged interpolation flaps are priceless options in skin cancer reconstruction. Their value lies in their flexibility, reach, reliability, and ability to repair distant, complex facial defects. Familiar interpolation flaps to dermatologic surgeons include the paramedian forehead flap, cheek-to-nose interpolation flaps, and auricular staged flaps. OBJECTIVE: In this special reconstructive issue, the paramedian forehead flap is discussed separately. This article highlights the cheek-to-nose and auricular interpolation flaps as applied to skin cancer defects. Design considerations, anatomic basis, execution, and the distinctions of each repair are presented. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with facial defects from Mohs micrographic surgery serve to illustrate the surgical techniques of each repair. RESULTS: With meticulous planning and thoughtful execution, cheek-to-nose and auricular staged flaps are capable of restoring both function and cosmesis. Several surgical stages are necessary, and an adequate supporting infrastructure is essential for an optimal outcome. CONCLUSION: Skin cancer patients with complex facial wounds from Mohs micrographic surgery may be assured of the highest possible cure rate. Further, their esthetic and functional reconstructive goals may be achieved with staged flaps for the nose and ear.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2005.31828

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Despite the need for two surgeries for its completion, the interpolation flap allows repairing extensive auricular wounds, even full-thickness ones.

    “Despite the need for two surgeries for its completion, this flap allows repairing extensive auricular wounds, even full-thickness ones.12, 13”

    From Auricular reconstruction after Mohs micrographic surgery: analysis of 101 cases (2021) · cites this paper as [13]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Nguyen, T. H.
Affiliations
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Nguyen, Tri H.
ORCID
Nguyen, Tri H.
Venue
Dermatologic Surgery
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2005-08
Volume
31
Issue
s2
Pages
1034-1045
ISSN
1076-0512 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1111/j.1524-4725.2005.31828
OpenAlex
W2141097811
Cited by
33
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Dermatologic Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Head and Neck Surgical Oncology
Keywords
staged reconstruction, skin cancer reconstruction, facial defects, Mohs micrographic surgery, paramedian forehead flap, nasal reconstruction, ear reconstruction, reconstructive surgery
MeSH terms
Cheek, Ear Cartilage, Humans, Nose, Rhinoplasty, Skin Neoplasms, Surgical Flaps

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review