Cited by 136Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

The Impact of Atrial Fibrillation on the Cost of Stroke: The Berlin Acute Stroke Study

Open access
Brüggenjürgen, Bernd, Rossnagel, Karin, Roll, Stephanie, Andersson, Fredrik L., Selim, Dagmar, Müller-Nordhorn, Jacqueline, Nolte, Christian H., Jungehülsing, Gerhard J. +2 more·2007·Value in Health

Abstract

Objectives Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an important risk factor for stroke. The primary purpose of this study was to determine the resource use for patients admitted to hospital with acute stroke and to calculate stroke-related direct costs, stratifying the results according to the presence of AF as a risk factor.Methods Data from 558 consecutive patients hospitalized with confirmed acute stroke between August 2000 and July 2001 were analyzed as part of the Berlin Acute Stroke Study. Sociodemographic variables were assessed by direct interview, while hospital data were derived from patient medical records. Patients or their carers completed a follow-up questionnaire about resource utilization and absenteeism from work during the 12-month period after hospital admission.Results Out of the 367 patients with follow-up data and ECG findings, 71 (19%) had AF. Patients with AF were generally older, more likely to be female, and had more severe strokes compared with those without AF. Mean direct costs per patient were significantly higher in those with AF-related strokes (EURO 11,799 vs EURO 8817 for non-AF-related strokes; P < 0.001). After adjustment for confounding factors, direct costs were comparable in the two groups, except for acute hospitalization costs, which remained significantly higher in the group with AF (P < 0.05).Conclusion Medical care for stroke patients with AF is associated with higher costs compared with those without AF; this is explained mainly by confounding factors and driven essentially by a significant difference in acute hospitalization costs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2006.00160.x

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brüggenjürgen, B., Rossnagel, K., Roll, S., Andersson, F. L., Selim, D., Müller-Nordhorn, J., Nolte, C. H., Jungehülsing, G. J., Villringer, A., & Willich, S. N.
Affiliations
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
  • AstraZeneca (Sweden) (SE)
Venue
Value in Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-03
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
137-143
ISSN
1098-3015 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2125757462
Cited by
136
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 13
FWCI
2.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Value in Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, stroke, direct costs, healthcare resource utilization, stroke risk factors, absenteeism
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Atrial Fibrillation, Berlin, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Demography, Female, Health Resources, Hospitals, Urban, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Social Class, Cost of Illness, Hospital Costs, Risk Assessment, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review