The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Use of Existing Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Instruments and Their Modification: The ISPOR Good Research Practices for Evaluating and Documenting Content Validity for the Use of Existing Instruments and Their Modification PRO Task Force Report
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Review of Psychometric theory (2nd ed.).
SITGREAVES, R. (1979) · Contemporary Psychology: A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.1037/018882 · Cited by 11,425
Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines
Malterud, K. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(01)05627-6 · Cited by 5,014
Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods.
Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037//1040-3590.7.3.238 · Cited by 2,387
Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing.
García, E. J. (2017) · Revista Española de Pedagogía · doi:10.22550/2174-0909.3051 · Cited by 2,217
Current Concepts in Validity and Reliability for Psychometric Instruments: Theory and Application
Cook, D. A., & Beckman, T. J. (2006) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.10.036 · Cited by 1,745
Patient-Reported Outcomes to Support Medical Product Labeling Claims: FDA Perspective
Patrick, D. L., Burke, L. B., Powers, J. H., Scott, J. A., Rock, E. P., Dawisha, S., O'Neill, R., & Kennedy, D. L. (2007) · Value in Health · doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00275.x · Cited by 726
Self-citationWhat Is Sufficient Evidence for the Reliability and Validity of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures?
Frost, M. H., Reeve, B. B., Liepa, A. M., Stauffer, J. W., & Hays, R. D. (2007) · Value in Health · doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00272.x · Cited by 572
Coons, S. J., Gwaltney, C. J., Hays, R. D., Lundy, J. J., Sloan, J. A., Revicki, D. A., Lenderking, W. R., Cella, D., & Basch, E. (2009) · Value in Health · doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00470.x · Cited by 537
Wild, D., Eremenco, S., Mear, I., Martin, M., Houchin, C., Gawlicki, M., Hareendran, A., Wiklund, I., Chong, L. Y., von Maltzahn, R., et al. (2009) · Value in Health · doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00471.x · Cited by 323
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Instrument Development and Selection Issues
Turner, R. R., Quittner, A. L., Parasuraman, B. M., Kallich, J. D., & Cleeland, C. S. (2007) · Value in Health · doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00271.x · Cited by 165
Cited by
Terwee, C. B., Prinsen, C. A. C., Chiarotto, A., Westerman, M. J., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Bouter, L. M., de Vet, H. C. W., & Mokkink, L. B. (2018) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-018-1829-0 · Cited by 2,348
Self-citationBest care at lower cost: the path to continuously learning health care in America
(2014) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.51-3277 · Cited by 1,363
Patrick, D. L., Burke, L. B., Gwaltney, C. J., Leidy, N. K., Martin, M. L., Molsen, E., & Ring, L. (2011) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.013 · Cited by 1,135
Self-citationPatrick, D. L., Burke, L. B., Gwaltney, C. J., Leidy, N. K., Martin, M. L., Molsen, E., & Ring, L. (2011) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.014 · Cited by 1,095
Self-citationDi Maio, M., Basch, E., Denis, F., Fallowfield, L. J., Ganz, P. A., Howell, D., Kowalski, C., Perrone, F., Stover, A. M., Sundaresan, P., et al. (2022) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2022.04.007 · Cited by 509
Metadata
- Authors
- Rothman, M., Burke, L., Erickson, P., Leidy, N. K., Patrick, D. L., & Petrie, C. D.
- Venue
- Value in Health
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-11
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1075-1083
- ISSN
- 1098-3015 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2142507445
- Cited by
- 435
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 25.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ (vor, 1353 d)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of Existing Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Instruments and Their Modification: The ISPOR Good Research Practices for Evaluating and Documenting Content Validity for the Use of Existing Instruments and Their Modification PRO Task Force Report. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00603.x
- The paper
- Rothman, M., Burke, L., Erickson, P., Leidy, N. K., Patrick, D. L., & Petrie, C. D. (2009). Use of Existing Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Instruments and Their Modification: The ISPOR Good Research Practices for Evaluating and Documenting Content Validity for the Use of Existing Instruments and Their Modification PRO Task Force Report. Value in Health. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00603.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
