Cited by 155Wound Healing and TreatmentsBacterial biofilms and quorum sensingDiabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management

Quantitative analysis of the cellular inflammatory response against biofilm bacteria in chronic wounds

Open access
Fazli, Mustafa, Bjarnsholt, Thomas, Kirketerp‐Møller, Klaus, Jørgensen, Anne, Andersen, Claus Bøgelund, Givskov, Michael, Tolker‐Nielsen, Tim·2011·Wound Repair and Regeneration

Abstract

Chronic wounds are an important problem worldwide. These wounds are characterized by a persistent inflammatory stage associated with excessive accumulation and elevated cell activity of neutrophils, suggesting that there must be a persistent stimulus that attracts and recruits neutrophils to the wound. One such stimulus might be the presence of bacterial biofilms in chronic wounds. In the present study, biopsy specimens from chronic venous leg ulcers were investigated for the detection of bacteria using peptide nucleic acid‐based fluorescence in situ hybridization (PNA‐FISH) and confocal laser scanning microscopy. The bacteria in the wounds were often situated in large aggregates. To obtain a measure of the cellular inflammatory response against the bacteria in the chronic wounds, the amount of neutrophils accumulated at the site of infection was evaluated through differential neutrophil counting on the tissue sections from wounds containing either Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Staphylococcus aureus. The P. aeruginosa‐containing wounds had significantly higher numbers of neutrophils accumulated compared with the S. aureus‐containing wounds. These results are discussed in relation to the hypothesis that the presence of P. aeruginosa biofilms in chronic wounds may be one of the main factors leading to a persistent inflammatory response and impaired wound healing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1524-475x.2011.00681.x

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Diegelmann RF, Evans MC. Wound healing: an overview of acute, fibrotic and delayed healing. Front Biosci 2004; 9: 283-9.
  2. Eming SA, Krieg T, Davidson JM. Inflammation in wound repair: molecular and cellular mechanisms. J Invest Dermatol 2007; 127: 514-25.
  3. Gjdsbl K, Christiensen JJ, Karlsmark T, Jrgensen B, Klein BM, Krogfelt KA. Multiple bacterial species reside in chronic wounds: a longitudinal study. Int Wound J 2006; 3: 225-31.
  4. Bjarnsholt T, Kirketerp-Mller K, Jensen PØ, Madsen KG, Phipps R, Krogfelt K, Hiby N, Givskov M. Why chronic wounds will not heal: a novel hypothesis. Wound Repair Re- gen 2008; 16: 2-10.
  5. Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP. Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science 1999; 284: 1318-22.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fazli, M., Bjarnsholt, T., Kirketerp‐Møller, K., Jørgensen, A., Andersen, C. B., Givskov, M., & Tolker‐Nielsen, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Bispebjerg Hospital (DK)
  • Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
Venue
Wound Repair and Regeneration
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-04-21
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
387-391
ISSN
  • 1067-1927 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-475X
OpenAlex
W1673697235
Cited by
155
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 4
FWCI
9.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Wound Repair and Regeneration (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Strategic Research Council
  • Statens Serum Institut
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
Keywords
chronic wounds, bacterial biofilms, neutrophil accumulation, chronic inflammation, chronic venous leg ulcers, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, PNA-FISH, confocal laser scanning microscopy, wound infection, delayed wound healing
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Inflammation, Male, Middle Aged, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Varicose Ulcer, Wound Healing, Wound Infection, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Biofilms, Peptide Nucleic Acids, Neutrophil Infiltration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review