Cited by 47Geological and Geochemical AnalysisGeological Studies and ExplorationGeological and Geophysical Studies

North‐west propagation of the Grenville orogen: Grenvillian structure and metamorphism near Key Harbour, Georgian Bay, Ontario, Canada*

JAMIESON, R. A., CULSHAW, N. G., CORRIGAN, D.·1995·Journal of Metamorphic Geology

Abstract

Abstract We report structural and metamorphic data from a c. 25‐km transect across the eastern Grenville Front Tectonic Zone (GFTZ) to the Britt domain at the northern end of Georgian Bay near Key Harbour, Ontario. Constrasting Grenvillian structural and fabric elements characterize the eastern GFTZ, northern Britt domain and a narrow Transition Zone between them. Moderately to steeply dipping foliations with strong down‐dip lineations in all three divisions appear to be associated with NW‐directed thrusting. In the Transition Zone and northern Britt domain, early S = L fabrics with steep lineations are overprinted by younger structures (S > L) with shallow, SE‐SSE‐plunging lineations in which sparse, dominantly (but not exclusively) normal‐sense kinematic indicators are recognized. Pressure and temperature estimates from Grenvillian metamorphic assemblages in metadi‐abase indicate that conditions of P ± 12 kbar and T c 800° C were achieved before or during the thrust‐related deformation, with P‐T‐t paths that indicate near‐isothermal decompression to P c. 4 kbar and T c. 700° C. Correlation of fabric elements with points on the P‐T‐t paths suggests that exhumation occurred during two stages, the first associated with thrusting (≥1035 Ma) and the second with extension and thrusting (pre‐1003 Ma). The GFTZ contains steeply to moderately dipping, thrust‐related fabrics and lacks shallow, extensional structures; the latest episode of thrusting in the GFTZ is inferred to have taken place at 990‐980 Ma. The data are interpreted in terms of a tectonic model involving two stages of propagation of the Grenville orogen towards its foreland (≥1035 Ma and ≥980 Ma), with an intervening period of extension, although the tectonic regime probably remained compressional on the scale of the orogen.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1525-1314.1995.tb00213.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Contractional displacements on front-parallel structures have resulted in a rise in metamorphic grade towards the interior of the orogen.

    “Grenvillian planar fabrics in the Parautochthonous belt are generally subparallel to the Grenville Front, and contractional displacements on frontparallel structures have resulted in a rise in metamorphic grade towards the interior of the orogen (Haggart et al. 1993; Rivers et al. 1993; Jamieson et al. 1995).”
  • Grenvillian planar fabrics in the Parautochthonous belt are generally subparallel to the Grenville Front.

    “Grenvillian planar fabrics in the Parautochthonous belt are generally subparallel to the Grenville Front, and contractional displacements on frontparallel structures have resulted in a rise in metamorphic grade towards the interior of the orogen (Haggart et al. 1993; Rivers et al. 1993; Jamieson et al. 1995).”
  • In the GFTZ in Ontario, evidence for two high-grade metamorphic events has been recorded at c45 1060 Ma and c45 980 Ma (Ottawa and Rigolet orogenies, respectively).

    “In contrast, in the GFTZ in Ontario, evidence for two high-grade metamorphic events has been recorded at c45 1060 Ma and c45 980 Ma (Ottawa and Rigolet orogenies, respectively; Jamieson et al. 1995).”
  • In the southern Parautochthonous belt in Ontario, P-T conditions of c45 1200 MPa / 800°C, developed at c45 1060 Ma during the Ottawa orogeny, were followed by a period of isothermal decompression.

    “In the southern Parautochthonous belt in Ontario, P-T conditions of c45 1200 MPa / 800°C, developed at c45 1060 Ma during the Ottawa orogeny, were followed by a period of isothermal decompression (Anovitz and Essene 1990; Jamieson et al. 1995).”
  • In cross-section A, the Mid-Parautochthon detachment system is known as the Boundary shear, a broad, moderately dipping zone of intensely flattened ductile gneiss in which oblique-normal kinematic indicators overprint older thrust structures.

    “In A, where it is known as the Boundary shear, it is a broad, moderately dipping zone of intensely flattened ductile gneiss in which oblique-normal kinematic indicators overprint older thrust structures (Jamieson et al. 1995).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
JAMIESON, R. A., CULSHAW, N. G., & CORRIGAN, D.
Affiliations
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
  • Carleton University (CA)
Corresponding author
JAMIESON, R. A.
Venue
Journal of Metamorphic Geology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-03
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
185-207
ISSN
  • 0263-4929 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1314
OpenAlex
W2080269596
Cited by
47
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Metamorphic Geology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › Geological Studies and Exploration
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › Geological and Geophysical Studies
Keywords
Grenville orogen, decompression, exhumation, metadiabase, extensional deformation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review