The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
OnabotulinumtoxinA for Treatment of Chronic Migraine: Pooled Results From the Double‐Blind, Randomized, Placebo‐Controlled Phases of the PREEMPT Clinical Program
Abstract
( Headache 2010;50:921‐936) Objective.— To assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of onabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX ® ) as headache prophylaxis in adults with chronic migraine. Background.— Chronic migraine is a prevalent, disabling, and undertreated neurological disorder. Few preventive treatments have been investigated and none is specifically indicated for chronic migraine. Methods.— The 2 multicenter, pivotal trials in the PREEMPT: Phase 3 REsearch Evaluating Migraine Prophylaxis Therapy clinical program each included a 24‐week randomized, double‐blind phase followed by a 32‐week open‐label phase (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT00156910, NCT00168428). Qualified patients were randomized (1:1) to onabotulinumtoxinA (155‐195 U) or placebo injections every 12 weeks. Study visits occurred every 4 weeks. These studies were identical in design (eg, inclusion/exclusion criteria, randomization, visits, double‐blind phase, open‐label phase, safety assessments, treatment), with the only exception being the designation of the primary and secondary endpoints. Therefore, the predefined pooling of the results was justified and performed to provide a complete overview of between‐group differences in efficacy, safety, and tolerability that may not have been evident in individual studies. The primary endpoint for the pooled analysis was mean change from baseline in frequency of headache days at 24 weeks. Secondary endpoints were mean change from baseline to week 24 in frequency of migraine/probable migraine days, frequency of moderate/severe headache days, total cumulative hours of headache on headache days, frequency of headache episodes, frequency of migraine/probable migraine episodes, frequency of acute headache pain medication intakes, and the proportion of patients with severe (≥60) Headache Impact Test‐6 score at week 24. Results of the pooled analyses of the 2 PREEMPT double‐blind phases are presented. Results.— A total of 1384 adults were randomized to onabotulinumtoxinA (n = 688) or placebo (n = 696). Pooled analyses demonstrated a large mean decrease from baseline in frequency of headache days, with statistically significant between‐group differences favoring onabotulinumtoxinA over placebo at week 24 (−8.4 vs −6.6; P < .001) and at all other time points. Significant differences favoring onabotulinumtoxinA were also observed for all secondary efficacy variables at all time points, with the exception of frequency of acute headache pain medication intakes. Adverse events occurred in 62.4% of onabotulinumtoxinA patients and 51.7% of placebo patients. Most patients reported adverse events that were mild to moderate in severity and few discontinued (onabotulinumtoxinA, 3.8%; placebo, 1.2%) due to adverse events. No unexpected treatment‐related adverse events were identified. Conclusions.— The pooled PREEMPT results demonstrate that onabotulinumtoxinA is an effective prophylactic treatment for chronic migraine. OnabotulinumtoxinA resulted in significant improvements compared with placebo in multiple headache symptom measures, and significantly reduced headache‐related disability and improved functioning, vitality, and overall health‐related quality of life. Repeat treatments with onabotulinumtoxinA were safe and well tolerated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A six-item short-form survey for measuring headache impact: The HIT-6™
Kosinski, M., Bayliss, M. S., Bjorner, J. B., Ware, J. E., Garber, W. H., Batenhorst, A., Cady, R., Dahlöf, C. G. H., Dowson, A., & Tepper, S. (2003) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1023/a:1026119331193 · Cited by 1,376
New Appendix Criteria Open for a Broader Concept of Chronic Migraine
Olesen, J., Bousser, M.-G., Diener, H.-C., Dodick, D., First, M., Goadsby, P., Göbel, H., Lainez, M., Lance, J., Lipton, R., et al. (2006) · Cephalalgia · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2982.2006.01172.x · Cited by 909 · cited 2×
“revised ICHD criteria, CM is recognized as a complication of migraine that is distinguished from episodic migraine (EM) by the frequency of headache.(4,5) CM is characterized by headache on 15 days per month, of which at least 8 headache days per month meet”
Self-citationSociodemographic and comorbidity profiles of chronic migraine and episodic migraine sufferers
Buse, D. C., Manack, A., Serrano, D., Turkel, C., & Lipton, R. B. (2010) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.2009.192492 · Cited by 622
Self-citationMedication-overuse headache: a worldwide problem
Diener, H.-C., & Limmroth, V. (2004) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(04)00824-5 · Cited by 455
Self-citationDevelopment and Validation of the Migraine‐Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire
Jhingran, P., Osterhaus, J. T., Miller, D. W., Lee, J. T., & Kirchdoerfer, L. (1998) · Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain · doi:10.1046/j.1526-4610.1998.3804295.x · Cited by 252
Mathew, N. T., & Jaffri, S. F. A. (2009) · Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain · doi:10.1111/j.1526-4610.2009.01566.x · Cited by 153 · cited 1×
“Recently, a pilot study reported comparable efficacy results for onabotulinumtoxinA (2 injections of 100-200 U intramuscularly every 12 weeks) and topiramate (100200 mg/day), with significant reductions from baseline in frequency of headache and frequency of migraine days and improved quality of life with each treatme…”
Cited by
Tepper, S., Ashina, M., Reuter, U., Brandes, J. L., Doležil, D., Silberstein, S., Winner, P., Leonardi, D., Mikol, D., & Lenz, R. (2017) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(17)30083-2 · Cited by 722
Self-citationChronic Migraine: Epidemiology and Disease Burden
Manack, A. N., Buse, D. C., & Lipton, R. B. (2011) · Current Pain and Headache Reports · doi:10.1007/s11916-010-0157-z · Cited by 230
Self-citationVandervorst, F., Van Deun, L., Van Dycke, A., Paemeleire, K., Reuter, U., Schoenen, J., & Versijpt, J. (2021) · The Journal of Headache and Pain · doi:10.1186/s10194-021-01335-2 · Cited by 121
Smitherman, T. A., Walters, A. B., Davis, R. E., Ambrose, C. E., Roland, M., Houle, T. T., & Rains, J. C. (2016) · Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain · doi:10.1111/head.12760 · Cited by 121
Lipton, R. B., Rosen, N. L., Ailani, J., DeGryse, R. E., Gillard, P. J., & Varon, S. F. (2016) · Cephalalgia · doi:10.1177/0333102416652092 · Cited by 85
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Dodick, D. W., Turkel, C. C., DeGryse, R. E., Aurora, S. K., Silberstein, S. D., Lipton, R. B., Diener, H., & Brin, M. F.
- Venue
- Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-06
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 921-936
- ISSN
- 0017-8748 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-4610
- OpenAlex
- W2167719770
- Cited by
- 994
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 35.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: OnabotulinumtoxinA for Treatment of Chronic Migraine: Pooled Results From the Double‐Blind, Randomized, Placebo‐Controlled Phases of the PREEMPT Clinical Program. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1526-4610.2010.01678.x
- The paper
- Dodick, D. W., Turkel, C. C., DeGryse, R. E., Aurora, S. K., Silberstein, S. D., Lipton, R. B., Diener, H., & Brin, M. F. (2010). OnabotulinumtoxinA for Treatment of Chronic Migraine: Pooled Results From the Double‐Blind, Randomized, Placebo‐Controlled Phases of the PREEMPT Clinical Program. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4610.2010.01678.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.