Cited by 277Migraine and Headache StudiesChild Abuse and TraumaTraumatic Brain Injury Research

Adverse Childhood Experiences and Frequent Headaches in Adults

Anda, Robert, Tietjen, Gretchen, Schulman, Elliott, Felitti, Vincent, Croft, Janet·2010·Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain

Abstract

Background A variety of studies have linked childhood maltreatment to headaches, including migraines, and to headache severity. This study assesses the relationship of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) to frequent headaches during adulthood. Methods We used data from the Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) study, which included 17,337 adult members of the Kaiser Health Plan in San Diego, CA who were undergoing a comprehensive preventive medical evaluation. The study assessed 8 ACEs including abuse (emotional, physical, sexual), witnessing domestic violence, growing up with mentally ill, substance abusing, or criminal household members, and parental separation or divorce. Our measure of headaches came from the medical review of systems using the question: "Are you troubled by frequent headaches?" We used the number of ACEs (ACE score) as a measure of cumulative childhood stress and hypothesized a "dose-response" relationship of the ACE score to the prevalence and risk of frequent headaches. Results Each of the ACEs was associated with an increased prevalence and risk of frequent headaches. As the ACE score increased the prevalence and risk of frequent headaches increased in a "dose-response" fashion. The risk of frequent headaches increased more than 2-fold (odds ratio 2.1, 95% confidence interval 1.8-2.4) in persons with an ACE score ≥5, compared to persons with and ACE score of 0. The dose-response relationship of the ACE score to frequent headaches was seen for both men…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2010.01756.x

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adults who had witnessed domestic violence during childhood were 1.3 times more likely to report frequent headaches than those who had not witnessed domestic violence.

    “Further research on the impact of adverse childhood experiences on adults revealed that those who had witnessed domestic violence during childhood were 1.3 times more likely to report frequent headaches than those who had not witnessed domestic violence (Anda et al., 2010).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anda, R., Tietjen, G., Schulman, E., Felitti, V., & Croft, J.
Venue
Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-10
Volume
50
Issue
9
Pages
1473-1481
ISSN
  • 0017-8748 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-4610
OpenAlex
W1930346527
Cited by
277
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Migraine and Headache Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
adverse childhood experiences, frequent headache, child abuse, dose-response relationship, migraine, ACE score, domestic violence exposure, parental separation
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Time, Comorbidity, Prevalence, Headache Disorders, Secondary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review