CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 140Mental Health Research TopicsPain Management and Opioid UseMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Real-Time Data Collection for Pain: Appraisal and Current Status

Stone, Arthur A., Broderick, Joan E.·2007·Pain Medicine
DOI 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2007.00372.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Real-time data capture (RTDC) techniques have rapidly developed with the advent of computer and information technology. We plan to discuss the use of RTDC in the assessment of pain, including issues pertaining to its rationale, sampling protocols, and our opinion on the current status of the methodology. DESIGN: This is "thought" piece involving no systematic data collection methods. RESULTS: We described the rationale for using RTDC, including issues in recall bias, the desire for detailed information about pain, and the ability to examine within-person associations between pain and other variables. The mechanics of RTDC implementations were discussed with a focus on sampling protocols and data collection methods. The final section concerned the status of RTDC. Current acceptance of RTDC is evaluated and three issues in the science of RTDC were discussed: the interpretation of differences between recall and the average of momentary assessments for the same period; if RTDC is advancing our understanding of pain; and, the issue of what consumers of pain assessments actually desire. RTDC extensions to feedback based on momentary assessments are also discussed. CONCLUSION: Real-time data collection can be a useful methodology for improving our understanding of pain and especially of its dynamic nature in real-world settings.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2007.00372.x

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 38 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Brunswik E . Systematic and Representative Design of Psychological Experiments. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press; 1949.
  2. Shiffman, 2001, Subject experience diaries in clinical research. Part 1. The patient experience movement, Appl Clin Trials, 10, 46

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–140 of 140

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Stone, A. A., & Broderick, J. E.
Affiliations
Stony Brook University (US)
ORCID
Venue
Pain Medicine
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2007-10
Volume
8
Issue
suppl 3
Pages
S85-S93
ISSN
  • 1526-2375 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-4637
DOI
10.1111/j.1526-4637.2007.00372.x
OpenAlex
W2011693047
Cited by
140
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1 (tdm, 2892 d)
Locations
  • Pain Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (AR052170-01, U01AR052170)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
real-time data acquisition, pain assessment, momentary assessment, recall bias, sampling protocols, within-person associations
MeSH terms
Data Collection, Humans, Medical Records, Memory, Pain, Pain Measurement, Surveys and Questionnaires, Mental Recall, Time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review