The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Real-Time Data Collection for Pain: Appraisal and Current Status
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Real-time data capture (RTDC) techniques have rapidly developed with the advent of computer and information technology. We plan to discuss the use of RTDC in the assessment of pain, including issues pertaining to its rationale, sampling protocols, and our opinion on the current status of the methodology. DESIGN: This is "thought" piece involving no systematic data collection methods. RESULTS: We described the rationale for using RTDC, including issues in recall bias, the desire for detailed information about pain, and the ability to examine within-person associations between pain and other variables. The mechanics of RTDC implementations were discussed with a focus on sampling protocols and data collection methods. The final section concerned the status of RTDC. Current acceptance of RTDC is evaluated and three issues in the science of RTDC were discussed: the interpretation of differences between recall and the average of momentary assessments for the same period; if RTDC is advancing our understanding of pain; and, the issue of what consumers of pain assessments actually desire. RTDC extensions to feedback based on momentary assessments are also discussed. CONCLUSION: Real-time data collection can be a useful methodology for improving our understanding of pain and especially of its dynamic nature in real-world settings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“when desktop PCs or laptops are used to monitor symptoms of PD to identify factors that cue panic attacks and avoidance, clients typically use daily or weekly electronic diary entries, which are likely biased by memory effects because clients must complete these diaries retrospectively and not in real-time [22–28].”
From Efficacy of a hybrid online training for panic symptoms and agoraphobia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. (2014) · cites this paper as [24]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1992) · PubMed · Cited by 33,716
The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual Framework and Item Selection
Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002 · Cited by 30,033
Validity and reliability of the Experience-Sampling Method
CSIKSZENTMIHALYI, M., & LARSON, R. (1987) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-198709000-00004 · Cited by 2,544
Ecological Momentary Assessment (Ema) in Behavioral Medicine
Stone, A. A., & Shiffman, S. (1994) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1093/abm/16.3.199 · Cited by 1,931
Self-citation(2000) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195122657.001.0001 · Cited by 1,340
Duration neglect in retrospective evaluations of affective episodes.
Fredrickson, B. L., & Kahneman, D. (1993) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.45 · Cited by 1,228
Answering Autobiographical Questions: The Impact of Memory and Inference on Surveys
Bradburn, N. M., Rips, L. J., & Shevell, S. K. (1987) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3563494 · Cited by 1,183
(2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315167534 · Cited by 1,147
Redelmeier, D. A., & Kahneman, D. (1996) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(96)02994-6 · Cited by 1,078
(1999) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410601261 · Cited by 767
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Brunswik E . Systematic and Representative Design of Psychological Experiments. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press; 1949.
- Shiffman, 2001, Subject experience diaries in clinical research. Part 1. The patient experience movement, Appl Clin Trials, 10, 46
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Trull, T. J., & Ebner-Priemer, U. W. (2009) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0017653 · Cited by 550
“Studies have revealed significant discrepancies between real-time assessments and retrospective self-reports of mood, symptoms, and behaviors across a range of clinical problems (e.g., see Fahrenberg et al., 2007; Solhan, Trull, Jahng, & Wood, 2009; Stone & Broderick, 2007).”
Ecological momentary assessment of mood disorders and mood dysregulation
Ebner-Priemer, U. W., & Trull, T. J. (2009) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0017075 · Cited by 530
Solhan, M. B., Trull, T. J., Jahng, S., & Wood, P. K. (2009) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0016869 · Cited by 362
Liao, Y., Skelton, K. R., Dunton, G. F., & Bruening, M. M. (2016) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.4954 · Cited by 311
Stinson, J., Jibb, L., Nguyen, C., Nathan, P. C., Maloney, A. M., Dupuis, L. L., Gerstle, J. T., Alman, B. A., Hopyan, S., Strahlendorf, C., et al. (2013) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.2350 · Cited by 288
Metadata
- Authors
- Stone, A. A., & Broderick, J. E.
- Affiliations
- Stony Brook University (US)
- Venue
- Pain Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-10
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- suppl 3
- Pages
- S85-S93
- ISSN
- 1526-2375 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-4637
- OpenAlex
- W2011693047
- Cited by
- 140
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 5.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pain Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (AR052170-01, U01AR052170)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Keywords
- real-time data acquisition, pain assessment, momentary assessment, recall bias, sampling protocols, within-person associations
- MeSH terms
- Data Collection, Humans, Medical Records, Memory, Pain, Pain Measurement, Surveys and Questionnaires, Mental Recall, Time
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
