Cited by 324Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchPain Mechanisms and Treatments

Prevalence of chronic pain in a representative sample in the United States.

Hardt, Jochen, Jacobsen, Clemma, Goldberg, Jack, Nickel, Ralf, Buchwald, Dedra·2008·Pain Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Chronic pain is a common reason for seeking medical care. We estimated the prevalence of chronic regional and widespread pain in the United States population overall, and by age, sex, and race/ethnicity. SETTING: We examined the data from 10,291 respondents who participated in the 1999-2002 NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) and completed a pain questionnaire. Items allowed classification of chronic (>or=3 months) pain as regional or widespread. We used regression models to test the association of sex and race/ethnicity with each pain outcome, adjusting for age. RESULTS: Chronic pain prevalence estimates were 10.1% for back pain, 7.1% for pain in the legs/feet, 4.1% for pain in the arms/hands, and 3.5% for headache. Chronic regional and widespread pain were reported by 11.0% and 3.6% of respondents, respectively. Women had higher odds than men for headache, abdominal pain, and chronic widespread pain. Mexican-Americans had lower odds compared with non-Hispanic whites and blacks for chronic back pain, legs/feet pain, arms/hands pain, and regional and widespread pain. CONCLUSION: The population prevalence of chronic pain in the United States was lower than previously reported, with smaller sex-related differences and some variation by race/ethnicity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2008.00425.x

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Nickel R, Raspe HH. [Chronic pain: Epidemiology and health care utilization]. Nervenarzt 2001; 72(12):897-906.
  2. Bowsher D, Rigge M, Sopp L. Prevalence of chronic pain in the British population. Pain Clinic 1991;4(4):223-230.
  3. Millar WJ. Chronic pain. Health Rep 1996;7(4): 47-53, 51-8.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hardt, J., Jacobsen, C., Goldberg, J., Nickel, R., & Buchwald, D.
Affiliations
Düsseldorf University Hospital (DE)
Corresponding author
Hardt, Jochen
Venue
Pain Medicine
Published
2008-10
Volume
9
Issue
7
Pages
803-812
ISSN
  • 1526-2375 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-4637
OpenAlex
W2069426265
Cited by
324
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 20
FWCI
9.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
chronic pain, prevalence, widespread pain, regional pain, back pain, headache, abdominal pain, sex differences, racial and ethnic differences, Mexican Americans, NHANES
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Male, Pain, Risk Factors, United States, Prevalence, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review