Cited by 185Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMedical Practices and RehabilitationPain Management and Treatment

The STarT back screening tool and individual psychological measures: evaluation of prognostic capabilities for low back pain clinical outcomes in outpatient physical therapy settings

Open access
Beneciuk, Jason M., Bishop, Mark D., Fritz, Julie M., Robinson, Michael E., Asal, Nabih R., Nisenzon, Anne N., George, Steven Z.·2013·Physical Therapy

Abstract

Background: Psychologically informed practice emphasizes routine identification of modifiable psychological risk factors being highlighted. Objective: The purpose of this study was to test the predictive validity of the STarT Back Screening Tool (SBT) in comparison with single-construct psychological measures for 6-month clinical outcomes. Design: This was an observational, prospective cohort study. Methods: Patients (n=146) receiving physical therapy for low back pain were administered the SBT and a battery of psychological measures (Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire physical activity scale and work scale [FABQ-PA and FABQ-W, respectively], Pain Catastrophizing Scale [PCS], 11-item version of the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia [TSK-11], and 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9]) at initial evaluation and 4 weeks later. Treatment was at the physical therapist's discretion. Clinical outcomes consisted of pain intensity and self-reported disability. Prediction of 6-month clinical outcomes was assessed for intake SBT and psychological measure scores using multiple regression models while controlling for other prognostic variables. In addition, the predictive capabilities of intake to 4-week changes in SBT and psychological measure scores for 6-month clinical outcomes were assessed. Results: Intake pain intensity scores (β=.39 to .45) and disability scores (β=.47 to .60) were the strongest predictors in all final regression models, explaining 22% and 24% and 43% and 48% of the variance for the respective clinical outcome at 6 months. Neither SBT nor psychological measure scores improved prediction of 6-month pain intensity. The SBT overall scores (β=.22) and SBT psychosocial scores (β=.25) added to the prediction of disability at 6 months. Four-week changes in TSK-11 scores (β=−.18) were predictive of pain intensity at 6 months. Four-week changes in FABQ-PA scores (β=−.21), TSK-11 scores (β=−.20) and SBT overall scores (β=−.18) were predictive of disability at 6 months. Limitations: Physical therapy treatment was not standardized or accounted for in the analysis. Conclusions: Prediction of clinical outcomes by psychology-based measures was dependent upon the clinical outcome domain of interest. Similar to studies from the primary care setting, initial screening with the SBT provided additional prognostic information for 6-month disability and changes in SBT overall scores may provide important clinical decision-making information for treatment monitoring.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2522/ptj.20120207

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The items used for impact stratification (pain intensity, pain interference, and functional status) have substantial research support for their discriminatory and prognostic importance.

    “These items have substantial research support to validate their discriminatory and prognostic importance. 13, 19, 31, 38, 39, 43, 47–49, 53, 54, 57–60, 66–68, 73, 76, 80, 82, 85, 86, 97, 106, 108, 110, 112–116, 122”
  • The STaRT Back Tool was developed in UK primary care and is designed to help physicians in the assessment of patients at risk of progressing from acute to chronic low back pain.

    “The STaRT Back Tool was developed in UK primary care and is designed to help physicians in the assessment of patients at risk of progressing from acute to chronic low back pain (LBP) [25].”
  • The STaRT Back Tool stratifies patients into low, medium and high risk and recommends appropriate treatment for each patient based on their risk level.

    “It stratifies patients into low, medium and high risk and recommends appropriate treatment for each patient based on their risk level [25].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beneciuk, J. M., Bishop, M. D., Fritz, J. M., Robinson, M. E., Asal, N. R., Nisenzon, A. N., & George, S. Z.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida (US)
  • Intermountain Healthcare (US)
  • University of Florida Health (US)
Corresponding author
  • Beneciuk, Jason M.
  • George, Steven Z.
Venue
Physical Therapy
Published
2013-03-01
Volume
93
Issue
3
Pages
321-333
ISSN
  • 0031-9023 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-6724
OpenAlex
W2133262543
Cited by
185
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 7
FWCI
9.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (T32HD043730)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
STarT Back Screening Tool, low back pain, prognostic validity, psychological risk factors, fear-avoidance beliefs, pain catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, depression, physical activity, disability, pain intensity, psychological screening, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, Patient Health Questionnaire, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire
MeSH terms
Disability Evaluation, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Pain Measurement, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Treatment Outcome, Low Back Pain, Physical Therapy Modalities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review