CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 181Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Development of an Integrated Treatment for Veterans with Comorbid Chronic Pain and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

Otis, John D., Keane, Terence M., Kerns, Robert D., Monson, Candice, Scioli, Erica·2009·Pain Medicine
DOI 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00715.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to describe the development of the first integrated treatment for Veterans with comorbid chronic pain and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). DESIGN: Descriptive, including pre- and posttreatment assessment results from a pilot study of six veterans with comorbid chronic pain and PTSD. SETTING: Northeastern Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center. INTERVENTIONS: Using components of cognitive processing therapy (CPT) for PTSD and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for chronic pain management, a 12-session integrated treatment for veterans with comorbid chronic pain and PTSD was developed. A therapist manual and patient workbook that included weekly readings and homework assignments were created. Participants received pre- and posttreatment evaluations using measures of pain, PTSD, physical disability, and psychological distress. The treatment development process is reviewed and the benefits and challenges of implementing this integrated treatment are presented. RESULTS: Several themes emerged over the course of implementing the treatment, including the importance of establishing participant trust, regular therapy attendance, and addressing participant avoidance. Of the six participants recruited for the pilot study, three withdrew from the study and three completed the integrated treatment. Participants reported that they generally liked the format of treatment, appreciated learning about the ways that chronic pain and PTSD share some common symptoms, and ways that the two disorders can interact with one another. The assessment results of those who completed treatment suggest that this treatment approach is feasible and may have clinical benefit. CONCLUSIONS: Participants appeared to benefit from receiving the integrated treatment for pain and PTSD. A randomized clinical trial is currently being conducted to evaluate the efficacy of this treatment approach.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00715.x

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Merskey H Bogduk N . IASP Task Force on Taxonomy. Seattle, WA: IASP Press; 1994:209–14.
  2. McFarlane, 1994, Physical symptoms in posttraumatic stress disorder, J Psychosom Res, 42, 607
  3. Barlow DH . Anxiety and Its Disorders. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2002.
  4. Jeffrey S , Ph.D. Mogil (ed.) The Genetics of Pain. Seattle, WA: IASP Press; 2004.
  5. Mueser KT Noordsy DL Drake RE Fox L . Integrated Treatment for Dual Disorders: A Guide to Effective Practice. New York, NY: The Guilford Press; 2003.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 181

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Otis, J. D., Keane, T. M., Kerns, R. D., Monson, C., & Scioli, E.
Affiliations
VA Boston Healthcare System (US)
Corresponding author
Otis, John D.
ORCID
Venue
Pain Medicine
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2009-10
Volume
10
Issue
7
Pages
1300-1311
ISSN
  • 1526-2375 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-4637
DOI
10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00715.x
OpenAlex
W1966659648
Cited by
178
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
8.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1 (tdm, 2161 d)
Locations
  • Pain Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (C3322R)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
chronic pain, post-traumatic stress disorder, comorbidities, veterans, integrated treatment, cognitive processing therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, treatment development, therapist manual, patient workbook, treatment feasibility, participant trust, avoidance
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Pain Measurement, Pilot Projects, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, United States, Veterans, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review