Cited by 60Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMyofascial pain diagnosis and treatment

Pain and Functional Capacity in Female Fibromyalgia Patients

Carbonell-Baeza, Ana, Aparicio, Virginia A., Sjöström, Michael, Ruiz, Jonatan R., Delgado-Fernández, Manuel·2011·Pain Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between pain and functional capacity levels. DESIGN: [corrected] Cross-sectional study. SETTING: University of Granada. SUBJECTS: One hundred twenty-three women with fibromyalgia (51.7 ± 7.2 years). OUTCOME MEASURES: We measured weight and height, and body mass index (BMI) was calculated. We assessed tender points by pressure pain and functional capacity by means of the 30-second chair stand, handgrip strength, chair sit and reach, back scratch, blind flamingo, 8-ft up and go and 6-minute walk tests. RESULTS: We observed an association of tender points count with the chair stand and 6-minute walk tests (r = -0.273, P = 0.004 and r = -0.183, P = 0.046, respectively). These associations became nonsignificant once the analyses were adjusted by weight or BMI. We observed an association of algometer score with the back scratch, chair stand, and 6-minute walk tests (r = 0.238, P = 0.009; r = 0.363, P < 0.001; and r = 0.186, P = 0.043, respectively), which remained after adjusting for weight or BMI, except the association between algometer score and the 6-minute walk test that became nonsignificant once the analyses were adjusted by weight. Prevalence of overweight and obesity was 39.2 and 33.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There is an inverse association of tender points count with the chair stand and distance walked in the 6-minute walk tests, and a positive association of algometer score with the chair stand, distance walked in the 6-minute walk and back scratch tests, yet, weight status seems to play a role in these associations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01239.x

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carbonell-Baeza, A., Aparicio, V. A., Sjöström, M., Ruiz, J. R., & Delgado-Fernández, M.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Granada (ES)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Venue
Pain Medicine
Published
2011-11
Volume
12
Issue
11
Pages
1667-1675
ISSN
  • 1526-2375 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-4637
OpenAlex
W2137694655
Cited by
60
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
Keywords
fibromyalgia, pain, functional capacity, tender points, algometry, body mass index, overweight, obesity, women, physical fitness, 6-minute walk test, chair stand test, grip strength
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Body Composition, Cross-Sectional Studies, Exercise Test, Female, Fibromyalgia, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Physical Endurance, Quality of Life, Spain, Body Mass Index, Musculoskeletal Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review