Cited by 881Physical Activity and HealthBalance, Gait, and Falls PreventionFrailty in Older Adults

Functional Fitness Normative Scores for Community-Residing Older Adults, Ages 60-94

Rikli, Roberta E., Jones, C. Jessie·1999·Journal of Aging and Physical Activity

Abstract

This article describes a nationwide study conducted to develop normative performance data for community-residing older adults. The physical parameters assessed are strength, aerobic endurance, flexibility, and agility/balance. Body mass index was also assessed as an estimate of body composition. The sample comprised 7,183 participants from 267 sites in 21 states. Summary data ( M , SD , and percentiles) are reported separately for men and women in 5-year age groups. Results reveal a pattern of decline across most age groups on all variables. ANOVA and post hoc comparisons indicated a significant main effect for age on all variables and that most 5-year age-group declines were significant ( p < .007). ANOVAs also revealed a significant main effect for gender on all test items ( p < .0001): Men scored better on strength, aerobic endurance, and agility/balance; women scored better on flexibility. The data provide information about normal variations within and usual rates of change across age groups, and they provide a database for subsequent evaluation of individual and group performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1123/japa.7.2.162

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Back-transforming the SMDs to natural units using SDs from a large observational cohort of community-living older adults, the GUG effect (SMD 0.34) corresponds to a mean (SD) 0.62 (1.85)-second improvement and the chair-stand effect (SMD 0.13) to a 0.56 (4.3)-stands improvement.

    “based on SDs from a large, observational cohort of community-living older adults,55 for GUG (SMD, 0.34), we estimated a mean (SD) 0.62 (1.85)-second improvement, and for chair stands (SMD, 0.13), a 0.56 (4.3)-stands improvement.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rikli, R. E., & Jones, C. J.
Venue
Journal of Aging and Physical Activity
Published
1999-04
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
162-181
ISSN
  • 1063-8652 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-267X
OpenAlex
W2166297998
Cited by
881
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 85 · 2021: 94 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 33
FWCI
1.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Aging and Physical Activity (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
Keywords
functional fitness, reference values, older adults, community-dwelling older adults, muscle strength, cardiorespiratory fitness, flexibility, agility, balance, body mass index, body composition, age-related decline, sex differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review