The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Review of the Pharmacological and Clinical Profile of Mirtazapine
Open accessAbstract
The novel antidepressant mirtazapine has a dual mode of action. It is a noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressant (NaSSA) that acts by antagonizing the adrenergic α 2‐autoreceptors and α 2‐heteroreceptors as well as by blocking 5‐HT 2 and 5‐HT 3 receptors. It enhances, therefore, the release of norepinephrine and 5‐HT 1A‐mediated serotonergic transmission. This dual mode of action may conceivably be responsible for mirtazapine's rapid onset of action. Mirtazapine is extensively metabolized in the liver. The cytochrome (CYP) P450 isoenzymes CYP1A2, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4 are mainly responsible for its metabolism. Using once daily dosing, steady‐state concentrations are reached after 4 days in adults and 6 days in the elderly.In vitro studies suggest that mirtazapine is unlikely to cause clinically significant drug‐drug interactions. Dry mouth, sedation, and increases in appetite and body weight are the most common adverse effects. In contrast to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), mirtazapine has no sexual side effects. The antidepressant efficacy of mirtazapine was established in several placebo‐controlled trials. In major depression, its efficacy is comparable to that of amitriptyline, clomipramine, doxepin, fluoxetine, paroxetine, citalopram, or venlafaxine. Mirtazapine also appears to be useful in patients suffering from depression comorbid with anxiety symptoms and sleep disturbance. It seems to be safe and effective during long‐term use.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Leinonen, E., Skarstein, J., Behnke, K., ??gren, H., & Th Helsdingen, J. (1999) · International Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1097/00004850-199911000-00002 · Cited by 146
Self-citation
Cited by
Malhi, G. S., Bassett, D., Boyce, P., Bryant, R., Fitzgerald, P. B., Fritz, K., Hopwood, M., Lyndon, B., Mulder, R., Murray, G., et al. (2015) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/0004867415617657 · Cited by 842
“, 2012): NaSSA (Amini et al., 2005; Anttila and Leinonen, 2001; Benkert et al., 2000; Leinonen et al., 1999; Watanabe et al., 2010); Melatonergic (Rouillon, 2006); NDRI (Stahl et al.”
BackgroundMolendijk, M. L., Bus, B. A. A., Spinhoven, P., Penninx, B. W. J. H., Kenis, G., Prickaerts, J., Voshaar, R. O., & Elzinga, B. M. (2011) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2010.98 · Cited by 437
Camilleri, M., Chedid, V., Ford, A. C., Haruma, K., Horowitz, M., Jones, K. L., Low, P. A., Park, S.-Y., Parkman, H. P., & Stanghellini, V. (2018) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-018-0038-z · Cited by 411
Oliva, V., Lippi, M., Paci, R., Del Fabro, L., Delvecchio, G., Brambilla, P., De Ronchi, D., Fanelli, G., & Serretti, A. (2021) · Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2021.110266 · Cited by 219
The serotonergic system in Parkinson's disease
Huot, P., Fox, S. H., & Brotchie, J. M. (2011) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2011.08.004 · Cited by 195
Metadata
- Authors
- Anttila, S. A. K., & Leinonen, E. V. J.
- Venue
- CNS Drug Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-09
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 249-264
- ISSN
- 1080-563X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3458
- OpenAlex
- W1991625714
- Cited by
- 795
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Review of the Pharmacological and Clinical Profile of Mirtazapine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1527-3458.2001.tb00198.x
- The paper
- Anttila, S. A. K., & Leinonen, E. V. J. (2001). A Review of the Pharmacological and Clinical Profile of Mirtazapine. CNS Drug Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-3458.2001.tb00198.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.