Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 436

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Neuropharmacological Basis for the Use of Memantine in the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease

Open access
Rogawski, Michael A., Wenk, Gary L.·2003·CNS Drug Reviews

Abstract

Memantine has been demonstrated to be safe and effective in the symptomatic treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD). While the neurobiological basis for the therapeutic activity of memantine is not fully understood, the drug is not a cholinesterase inhibitor and, therefore, acts differently from current AD therapies. Memantine can interact with a variety of ligand‐gated ion channels. However, NMDA receptors appear to be a key target of memantine at therapeutic concentrations. Memantine is an uncompetitive (channel blocking) NMDA receptor antagonist. Like other NMDA receptor antagonists, memantine at high concentrations can inhibit mechanisms of synaptic plasticity that are believed to underlie learning and memory. However, at lower, clinically relevant concentrations memantine can under some circumstances promote synaptic plasticity and preserve or enhance memory in animal models of AD. In addition, memantine can protect against the excitotoxic destruction of cholinergic neurons. Blockade of NMDA receptors by memantine could theoretically confer disease‐modifying activity in AD by inhibiting the “weak” NMDA receptor‐dependent excitotoxicity that has been hypothesized to play a role in the progressive neuronal loss that underlies the evolving dementia. Moreover, recent in vitro studies suggest that memantine abrogates β‐amyloid (Aβ) toxicity and possibly inhibits Aβ production. Considerable attention has focused on the investigation of theories to explain the better tolerability of memantine over other NMDA receptor antagonists, particularly those that act by a similar channel blocking mechanism such as dissociative anesthetic‐like agents (phencyclidine, ketamine, MK‐801). A variety of channel‐level factors could be relevant, including fast channel‐blocking kinetics and strong voltage‐dependence (allowing rapid relief of block during synaptic activity), as well as reduced trapping (permitting egress from closed channels). These factors may allow memantine to block channel activity induced by low, tonic levels of glutamate — an action that might contribute to symptomatic improvement and could theoretically protect against weak excitotoxicity — while sparing synaptic responses required for normal behavioral functioning, cognition and memory.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1527-3458.2003.tb00254.x

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

See all 436

Metadata

Authors
Rogawski, M. A., & Wenk, G. L.
Venue
CNS Drug Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-09
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
275-308
ISSN
  • 1080-563X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-3458
OpenAlex
W1967480902
Cited by
436
References
15
FWCI
11.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Neuropharmacological Basis for the Use of Memantine in the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1527-3458.2003.tb00254.x
The paper
Rogawski, M. A., & Wenk, G. L. (2003). The Neuropharmacological Basis for the Use of Memantine in the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease. CNS Drug Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-3458.2003.tb00254.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.