Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 331

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Selection of Antiepileptic Drug Polytherapy Based on Mechanisms of Action: The Evidence Reviewed

Open access
Deckers, Charles L. P., Czuczwar, Stanislaw J., Hekster, Yechiel A., Kewser, Antoine, Kubova, Hana, Meinardi, Harry, Patsalos, Philip N., Renier, Willy O., Van Rijn, Clementina M.·2000·Epilepsia

Abstract

Summary: Purpose: When monotherapy with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) fails, combination therapy is tried in an attempt to improve effectiveness by improving efficacy, tolerability, or both. We reviewed the available studies (both animal and human) on AED polytherapy to determine whether AEDs can be selected for combination therapy based on their mechanisms of action, and if so, which combinations are associated with increased effectiveness. Because various designs and methods of analysis were used in these studies, it was also necessary to evaluate the appropriateness of these approaches. Methods: Published papers reporting on AED polytherapy in animals or humans were identified by Medline search and by checking references cited in these papers. Results: Thirty‐nine papers were identified reporting on two‐drug AED combinations. Several combinations were reported to offer improved effectiveness, but no uniform approach was used in either animal or human studies for the evaluation of pharmacodynamic drug interactions; efficacy was often the only end point. Conclusions: There is evidence that AED polytherapy based on mechanisms of action may enhance effectiveness. In particular, combining a sodium channel blocker with a drug enhancing GABAergic inhibition appears to be advantageous. Combining two GABA mimetic drugs or combining an AMPA antagonist with an NMDA antagonist may enhance efficacy, but tolerability is sometimes reduced. Combining two sodium channel blockers seems less promising. However, given the incomplete knowledge of the pathophysiology of seizures and indeed of the exact mechanisms of action of AEDs, an empirical but rational approach for evaluating AED combinations is of fundamental importance. This would involve appropriate testing of all possible combinations in animal models and subsequent evaluation of advantageous combinations in clinical trials. Testing procedures in animals should include the isobologram method, and the concept of drug load should be the basis of studies in patients with epilepsy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1528-1157.2000.tb00111.x

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Cited by

See all 331

Metadata

Authors
Deckers, C. L. P., Czuczwar, S. J., Hekster, Y. A., Kewser, A., Kubova, H., Meinardi, H., Patsalos, P. N., Renier, W. O., & Van Rijn, C. M.
Venue
Epilepsia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-11
Volume
41
Issue
11
Pages
1364-1374
ISSN
  • 0013-9580 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-1167
OpenAlex
W2117821503
Cited by
331
References
46
FWCI
12.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selection of Antiepileptic Drug Polytherapy Based on Mechanisms of Action: The Evidence Reviewed. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1528-1157.2000.tb00111.x
The paper
Deckers, C. L. P., Czuczwar, S. J., Hekster, Y. A., Kewser, A., Kubova, H., Meinardi, H., Patsalos, P. N., Renier, W. O., & Van Rijn, C. M. (2000). Selection of Antiepileptic Drug Polytherapy Based on Mechanisms of Action: The Evidence Reviewed. Epilepsia. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1157.2000.tb00111.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.