Cited by 146Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchEpilepsy research and treatmentGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

The autism‐epilepsy connection

Open access
Levisohn, Paul M.·2007·Epilepsia

Abstract

Summary The high prevalence of epilepsy in children with autism supports a neurobiologic etiology for autism. It remains unclear whether seizures and epileptiform activity on the EEG are causative or comorbid. It is also uncertain if focal epileptiform EEG abnormalities may be associated with stable cognitive impairment. Even less clear is whether these EEG abnormalities can result in the combination of language and social dysfunction seen in autistic spectrum disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01399.x

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The 'broken mirror' theory, proposing a specific failure in ASD of the ability of the brain to 'mirror' observed actions, was based on altered μ-wave suppression in ASD but was later questioned both theoretically and empirically, pointing toward a more complex picture of dysfunctional executive functions and visual attention.

    “One theory proposing a specific failure in ASD of the ability of the brain to ' mirror ' observed actions of another person (thereby named the 'broken mirror' theory ) was based on altered μ -wave suppression in ASD 93 but was later questioned both theoretically 94,95 and empirically 96,97 , pointing toward a more complex picture of dysfunctional executive functions and visual attention 98”

    From Autism spectrum disorder (2020) · cites this paper as [93]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Levisohn, P. M.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Denver (US)
Corresponding author
Levisohn, Paul M.
Venue
Epilepsia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-11-29
Volume
48
Issue
s9
Pages
33-35
ISSN
  • 0013-9580 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-1167
OpenAlex
W1545240335
Cited by
146
References
16
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Epilepsia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, epilepsy, seizures, epileptiform EEG abnormalities, comorbidities, cognitive impairment, language disorders, social dysfunction
MeSH terms
Autistic Disorder, Cognition Disorders, Electroencephalography, Epilepsy, Humans, Models, Psychological, Regression, Psychology, Comorbidity, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review