The DOI matches its Crossref record; 317 of the 317 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams
Abstract
Teams of people working together for a common purpose have been a centerpiece of human social organization ever since our ancient ancestors first banded together to hunt game, raise families, and defend their communities. Human history is largely a story of people working together in groups to explore, achieve, and conquer. Yet, the modern concept of work in large organizations that developed in the late 19th and early 20th centuries is largely a tale of work as a collection of individual jobs. A variety of global forces unfolding over the last two decades, however, has pushed organizations worldwide to restructure work around teams, to enable more rapid, flexible, and adaptive responses to the unexpected. This shift in the structure of work has made team effectiveness a salient organizational concern. Teams touch our lives everyday and their effectiveness is important to well-being across a wide range of societal functions. There is over 50 years of psychological research—literally thousands of studies—focused on understanding and influencing the processes that underlie team effectiveness. Our goal in this monograph is to sift through this voluminous literature to identify what we know, what we think we know, and what we need to know to improve the effectiveness of work groups and teams. We begin by defining team effectiveness and establishing the conceptual underpinnings of our approach to understanding it. We then turn to our review, which concentrates primarily on topics that have well-developed theoretical and empirical foundations, to ensure that our conclusions and recommendations are on firm footing. Our review begins by focusing on cognitive, motivational/affective, and behavioral team processes—processes that enable team members to combine their resources to resolve task demands and, in so doing, be effective. We then turn our attention to identifying interventions, or “levers,” that can shape or align team processes and thereby provide tools and applications that can improve team effectiveness. Topic-specific conclusions and recommendations are given throughout the review. There is a solid foundation for concluding that there is an emerging science of team effectiveness and that findings from this research foundation provide several means to improve team effectiveness. In the concluding section, we summarize our primary findings to highlight specific research, application, and policy recommendations for enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158 · Cited by 46,835
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925
Self-efficacy: the exercise of control
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-1826 · Cited by 24,451
Longshore, J. M., & Bass, B. M. (1987) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258081 · Cited by 12,424
The Social Psychology of Organizations.
Hackman, J. R., Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2989929 · Cited by 12,243
Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams
Edmondson, A. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2666999 · Cited by 12,026
Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
Hammer, T. H., Anderson, J. F., Gurdon, M. A., Jick, T. D., Petit, A., Stern, R. N., Schwartz, H., Vardi, Y., & Dunnette, M. D. (1977) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2391755 · Cited by 11,947
Research in Organizational Behavior.
Grimes, A. J., Cummings, L. L., & Staw, B. M. (1986) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392975 · Cited by 11,303
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1978) · Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0146-6402(78)90002-4 · Cited by 10,586
Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1994) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198288787.001.0001 · Cited by 7,371
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- Ancona D.G., 1996, Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 251
- Argote L., 1993, International review of industrial and organizational psychology, 8, 333
- Barsade S.G., 1998, Composition: Research on managing groups and teams, 1, 81
- Bliese P.D., 2000, Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations, 349
- Brown K.G., Kozlowski S.W.J. (1999, April). Toward an expanded conceptualization of emergent organizational phenomena: Dispersion theory . Paper presented at the 14th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Atlanta, GA .
- Burke C.S., Leadership Quarterly
- Burns J.M., 1978, Leadership
- Burns T., 1961, The management in innovation
- Cannon-Bowers J.A., Learning, training, and development in organizations
- Chao G.T., Kozlowski S.W.J., Major D.A., Gardner P. (1994, April). The effects of individual and contextual factors on organizational socialization and outcomes. In S.W.J. Kozlowski (Chair), Transitions during organizational socialization: Newcomer expectations, information-seeking, and learning outcomes . Symposium presented at the 9th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Nashville, TN .
- DeShon R.P., Milner K.R., Kozlowski S.W.J., Toney R.J., Schmidt A., Wiechmann D., Davis C. (1999, April). The effects of team goal orientation on individual and team performance . Paper presented at the 14th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Atlanta, GA .
- Dyer J.C., 1984, Human factors review, 285
- Ellis A.P.J., 2005, Understanding teams: A volume in research in management, 1
- Flin R., 2001, Improving teamwork in organizations, 217
- Galbraith J., 1972, Organizational planning: Cases and concepts, 530
- Graen G.B., 1987, Research in organizational behavior, 9, 175
- Hackman J.R., 1976, Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, 1455
- Hackman J.R., 1992, Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, 3, 199
- Human Technology., 1993, Training and development framework and descriptions of best practices
- Kozlowski S.W.J., Group learning
- Kozlowski S.W.J., 2000, Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations, 157
- Kozlowski S.W.J., 1996, Research in personnel and human resource management, 14, 253
- Kozlowski S.W.J., 1999, The changing nature of work performance: Implications for staffing, personnel actions, and development, 240
- Lee C., 1991, Training, 28, 447
- Mathieu J.E., Journal of Applied Psychology
- Mathieu J.E., Academy of Management Journal
- Ployhart R.E., 2005, Handbook of personnel selection, 495
- Salas E., 1992, Teams: Their training and performance, 3
- Schiflett S.C., 1982, The definition and measurement of team functions (Rep. No. ARRO-3068-FR-R81-4)
- Schmidt A.M., Journal of Applied Psychology
- Schneider B., 2000, Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations, 91
- Shea G.P., 1987, Research in personnel and human resource management, 5, 323
- Smolek J., 1999, Supporting work team effectiveness, 24
- Swezey R.W., 1992, Teams: Their training and performance, 219
- Zachary W. (2004, Dec). Computational modeling and teams, Towards the Next Frontier in Research on Team Effectiveness . Workshop sponsored by the US Army Research Institute and the University of Central Florida. Orlando, FL .
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Team Effectiveness 1997-2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse Into the Future
Mathieu, J. E., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T. L., & Gilson, L. L. (2008) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206308316061 · Cited by 2,622
Social Exchange Theory: A Critical Review with Theoretical Remedies
Cropanzano, R., Anthony, E. L., Daniels, S. R., & Hall, A. V. (2017) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2015.0099 · Cited by 2,545
Hulsheger, U. R., Anderson, N. R., & Salgado, J. F. (2009) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015978 · Cited by 1,631
7 Redesigning Work Design Theories: The Rise of Relational and Proactive Perspectives
Grant, A. M., & Parker, S. K. (2009) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.1080/19416520903047327 · Cited by 1,555
EMERGENCE OF THE HUMAN CAPITAL RESOURCE: A MULTILEVEL MODEL.
Ployhart, R. E., & Moliterno, T. P. (2011) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2009.0318 · Cited by 1,327
Metadata
- Authors
- Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen, D. R.
- Affiliations
- Michigan State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kozlowski, Steve W.J.
- Venue
- Psychological Science in the Public Interest
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-12
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 77-124
- ISSN
- 1539-6053 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-1006
- OpenAlex
- W2111859378
- Semantic Scholar
- 2bd8f5a11c4e6f3e7b596fe1d79c1ec510531191
- Cited by
- 2,623
- References
- 309
- Citations by year
- 2026: 158 · 2025: 173 · 2024: 203 · 2023: 174 · 2022: 153 · 2021: 151 · 2020: 153 · 2019: 163 · 2018: 157 · 2017: 164 · 2016: 114 · 2015: 136 · 2014: 144 · 2013: 123 · 2012: 139
- FWCI
- 51.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Gothic.net (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- team effectiveness, work teams, team processes, cognitive processes, motivational processes, emotional processing, behavioral processes, team-based intervention, organizational restructuring
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review