Cited by 190Face Recognition and PerceptionSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects

Alcoholics’Deficits in the Decoding of Emotional Facial Expression

Philippot, Pierre, Kornreich, Charles, Blairy, Sylvie, Baert, Iseult, Dulk, Anne Den, Bon, Olivier Le, Streel, Emmanuel, Hess, Ursula +2 more·1999·Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research

Abstract

The present study investigated emotional facial expression decoding in alcoholics. Twenty‐five alcoholic patients at the end of the detoxification process were compared with 25 volunteers matched for age, sex, and education. They were presented with facial expressions of neutral, mild, moderate, or strong emotional intensity. Results indicate that alcoholics overestimate the intensity of emotional expressions and make more errors in their decoding with a special bias for anger and contempt. Moreover, this decoding deficit is not perceived by the alcoholic patients. A general model is proposed that links visuospatial deficits, abnormal processing of social information, interpersonal stress, and alcohol abuse.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1999.tb04221.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Even in abstinence, individuals with an AUD diagnosis show an exaggerated hostility bias and hostile attribution bias in laboratory paradigms.

    “even in abstinence, individuals with an AUD diagnosis show an exaggerated hostility bias (the tendency to perceive neutral stimuli as threatening) as well as hostile attribution bias (the tendency to perceive negative outcomes as the result of others’ hostility) in laboratory paradigms (Philippot et al. 1999; Maurage et al. 2008, 2009; Dethier And Blairy 2012; Freeman et al. 2018; Hoffman et al. 2”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Philippot, P., Kornreich, C., Blairy, S., Baert, I., Dulk, A. D., Bon, O. L., Streel, E., Hess, U., Pelc, I., & Verbanck, P.
Affiliations
Université du Québec à Montréal (CA)
Corresponding author
Philippot, Pierre
Venue
Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-06
Volume
23
Issue
6
Pages
1031-1038
ISSN
  • 0145-6008 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-0277
OpenAlex
W2067992719
Cited by
190
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion)
  • ORBi (University of Liège) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Keywords
alcoholism, emotional facial expressions, facial expression decoding, anger, contempt, visuospatial deficits, social information processing, interpersonal stress, alcohol abuse
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcoholism, Emotions, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Social Perception, Temperance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review