Cited by 30Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesFace Recognition and PerceptionAction Observation and Synchronization

Capacity for cognitive and emotional empathy in alcohol-dependent patients.

Open access
Dethier, Marie, Blairy, Sylvie·2012·Psychology of Addictive Behaviors

Abstract

This study assessed two previously unexplored facets of empathy in alcohol-dependent patients (ADs) divided into two groups according to Cloninger's alcoholism typology: the attribution of intentions according to emotional facial expressions (EFEs) and emotional contagion in reaction to EFEs. Twenty-three male Type-I ADs, 21 male Type-II ADs, and 24 male control participants were compared in two computerized tasks. First, participants rated the extent to which an adjective descriptive of personality weighted on interpersonal dimensions (of rejection, aggressiveness, dominance, and affiliation) corresponded with a video of a neutral EFE that changed to an intense EFE. Second, participants evaluated their own emotional states after watching a series of videos that depicted EFEs while their own face was being filmed. The results showed that Type-I ADs attributed more rejection intentions and fewer affiliation intentions to EFEs compared with controls; however, depression might better explain this biased attribution. Furthermore, AD subtypes showed a different pattern of intention attribution according to the emotions that were portrayed and the sex of the stimulus. In addition, angry EFE mimicry was stronger in Type-II ADs than other participants. Finally, ADs expressed fewer positive emotions and more negative emotions than controls when watching EFEs. These findings emphasize the importance of differentiating alcoholism subtypes and contribute to the understanding of AD interpersonal behaviors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0028673

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Even in abstinence, individuals with an AUD diagnosis show an exaggerated hostility bias and hostile attribution bias in laboratory paradigms.

    “even in abstinence, individuals with an AUD diagnosis show an exaggerated hostility bias (the tendency to perceive neutral stimuli as threatening) as well as hostile attribution bias (the tendency to perceive negative outcomes as the result of others’ hostility) in laboratory paradigms (Philippot et al. 1999; Maurage et al. 2008, 2009; Dethier And Blairy 2012; Freeman et al. 2018; Hoffman et al. 2”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dethier, M., & Blairy, S.
Affiliations
University of Liège (BE)
Venue
Psychology of Addictive Behaviors
Published
2012
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
371-383
ISSN
  • 0893-164X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1501
OpenAlex
W2049199723
Cited by
30
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 4
FWCI
1.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Psychology of Addictive Behaviors (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège) (submittedVersion)
  • ORBi (University of Liège) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
alcoholism, empathy, emotional facial expressions, intention attribution, emotional contagion, emotional mimicry, interpersonal behavior, depression, sex differences
MeSH terms
Adult, Aggression, Alcoholism, Antisocial Personality Disorder, Belgium, Cognition, Depressive Disorder, Emotions, Empathy, Facial Expression, Humans, Internal-External Control, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Rejection, Psychology, Semantics, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Intention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review